Back

Fine-scale landscape genomics show asymmetric patterns of gene flow for the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus

Ding, J. Y.; Reed, E. M.; Reiskind, M. H.; Burford Reiskind, M. O.

2026-06-02 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.29.728763 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mosquito-borne viruses like dengue, Zika, and chikungunya pose increasing health risks in the United States due to the expanding range of Aedes albopictus, a highly invasive mosquito species that now has a global distribution. Aedes albopictus thrive in artificial containers associated with anthropogenic land use, allowing populations to reach high numbers in urban and suburban environments. While the global spread of Ae. albopictus has been well-characterized, the effects of heterogeneous urban landscapes on dispersal and gene flow at fine spatial scales remain unclear. This study analyzed the genetic connectivity of Aedes albopictus populations collected in Wake County, North Carolina in 2018. We used single nucleotide polymorphisms SNP data from double-digest restriction-enzyme associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq), and examined genetic connectivity through principal component analysis (PCA) and genetic network analysis. We then evaluated migration and source sink dynamics using a Bayesian approach for SNP data (BA3-SNP). We found little evidence of genetic clustering or isolated populations of Ae. albopictus in Wake County, suggesting high gene flow between sites. Migration analysis demonstrated asymmetric gene flow from rural to urban regions within Wake County, with greater gene flow occurring between and within urban regions. These findings suggest that Ae. albopictus populations demonstrate substantial gene flow within local metropolitan areas, with urban city centers serving as genetic sinks and surrounding suburban and rural regions serving as sources. This study highlights how heterogeneous landscapes shape mosquito population connectivity and migration at fine spatial scales, which is critical for informing vector control and public health intervention strategies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Entomology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.5%
4
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.1%
6
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
11
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
25
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
27
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%