Back

MRI-Compatible Rigid Head Holders for Artifact-Free Multimodal Imaging in Mice

Filser, S. S. B.; Varga, D. P.; Calandra, G.-M.; Makra, P.; Nebeling, F. C.; Evers-Dietze, B.; Wawers, W.; Liesz, A.; Salomoni, P.; Hecker, D.; Doshi, H.; Fava, E.; Hesse, C.; Plesnila, N.; Fried, H.-U.

2026-06-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.29.728741 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeHigh-resolution intravital microscopy allows cellular-scale analysis of the brain in vivo but is greatly sensitive to physiological motion. Combining optical microscopy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the same animal could relate cellular and mesoscale functional readout to whole-brain structural information, but this requires head holders that are both mechanically rigid and MRI compatible. Conventional metallic head holders introduce MRI artifacts, whereas many nonmetallic alternatives lack sufficient stability for chronic microscopy. Thus, we developed rigid, MRI-compatible head holders engineered from 3D-printed zirconia ceramics to reduce motion during microscopy while preserving MRI image quality. MethodsHead holders were designed for mouse cranial fixation and fabricated from zirconia ceramics using additive manufacturing. We quantified motion artifacts during two-photon and multimodal widefield imaging of the mouse cortex and assessed their impact on neuronal calcium activity, functional connectivity, and hemodynamic readouts. MRI compatibility was evaluated by measuring image quality in the presence of the head holder. ResultsThe ceramic head holders provided mechanical stability to reduce motion artifacts to micrometer levels during intravital imaging. The head holders produced no detectable susceptibility artifacts in MRI, and image contrast was comparable to control acquisitions performed without head holder. Sequential optical and MRI imaging of the same brain regions established artifact-minimized multimodal data acquisition within the same animal. ConclusionsNon-metallic ceramic head holders support longitudinal multimodal studies that combine high-resolution optical microscopy with whole-brain MRI measurements in the same animal.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
26.9%
2
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.9%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
7
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.1%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.3%
14
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
Optica
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
18
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%