Back

Genomic-Adjusted Radiation Dose from Bulk RNA Sequencing for Personalized Radiotherapy

Bergman, D. T.; Durkin, J.; Joshi, N.; Eschrich, S. A.; Torres-Roca, J. F.; Scott, J. G.

2026-05-30 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.29.728725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Radiotherapy is delivered to more than half of all patients with cancer yet is prescribed using uniform physical doses despite well-established interpatient variability in biological response. The genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD), derived from the radiosensitivity index (RSI), integrates tumor transcriptomics with radiation dose to estimate patient-specific treatment effect, and has been clinically validated as a predictor of radiotherapy benefit across diverse disease sites, including breast, lung, head and neck, glioma, sarcoma, rectal, and endometrial cancers. However, further clinical validation and deployment has been limited by reliance on microarray-based expression. Here we develop an RNA sequencing-based formulation of RSI (RSI-seq) and show that it preserves the functional properties of the original model across measurement platforms. RSI-seq maintains concordance with microarray RSI, including preservation of patient rank ordering (pooled Spearman{rho} = 0.86), and, when integrated into GARD, reproduces predicted changes in biological effect under clinically relevant dose perturbations (R2 [≥] 0.78 for {Delta}GARD in both directions). This preservation of interventional prediction is robust to expression noise and invariant to normalization strategy, enabling consistent application across RNA-seq pipelines. Application across the TCGA pan-cancer transcriptomic atlas demonstrates scalability across tumor types, with cohort medians agreeing closely with previously published microarray RSI medians (Spearman{rho} = 0.68, Pearson r = 0.85 across 20 matched cohorts). By bringing a clinically validated radiogenomic dose model into the RNA-sequencing era, RSI-seq makes biologically personalized radiotherapy directly accessible, retrospectively in existing RNA-seq cohorts and prospectively in modern clinical sequencing workflows, across the full range of tumor types treated with radiation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.6%
2
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
4
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
11
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
16
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
20
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
23
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%