Back

Circular RNA-associated QTLs show stronger association with splicing-QTLs than with expression-QTLs

Zabala, A.; Ascension, A. M.; Iniguez, S. G.; Iparraguirre, L.; Andres-Leon, E.; Matesanz, F.; Otaegui, D.; Munoz-Culla, M.

2026-05-29 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.29.728707 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCircular RNA quantitative trait loci (circQTLs) have emerged as a class of regulatory variants, but their mechanistic basis remains poorly characterized. Understanding how genetic variation influences circRNA biogenesis is essential to clarify their role in post-transcriptional gene regulation. MethodsWe systematically compared circQTLs with matched splicing (sQTL) and expression (eQTL) datasets. Using bootstrap-based Jaccard similarity analyses, we quantified genomic overlap patterns and assessed their statistical significance. We further validated these findings across independent circQTL studies. In addition, we analyzed the genomic distribution of circQTLs to identify enrichment patterns across functional genomic regions. ResultscircQTLs exhibited a statistically significant but modestly stronger genomic overlap with sQTLs compared to eQTLs. This pattern was consistent across independent datasets despite limited reproducibility of individual circQTL signals. Genomic annotation revealed distinct distributional patterns, including depletion in exonic regions and relative enrichment in non-coding genomic contexts compared to other QTL classes. DiscussionTogether, these results suggest that circRNA-associated regulatory variation is preferentially linked to splicing-related mechanisms rather than transcriptional control of host genes. However, the modest effect size indicates that this relationship is not exclusive, and likely reflects a mixture of shared splice-site regulatory effects and additional mechanisms specific to back-splicing that are not captured by conventional sQTL or eQTL frameworks. This dual architecture positions circRNA biogenesis at the interface between splicing dynamics, RNA structure, and higher-order genomic organization, supporting circQTLs as a distinct layer of post-transcriptional gene regulation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 7%
17.9%
2
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.8%
3
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.8%
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.1%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.1%
6
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.4%
10
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
12
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
14
Mobile DNA
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
16
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
18
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
20
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%