Back

Propagation mode shapes contrasting growth strategies through aquaporin networks in onion

Barzana, G.; Carvajal, M.

2026-06-02 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.29.728701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Propagation mode strongly influences crop establishment, yet its impact on whole-plant transport strategies remains poorly understood. Here, we examined whether seed- and set-derived plants deploy contrasting aquaporin networks associated with different physiological behaviours in onion (Allium cepa L.). We combined genome-wide gene-family characterisation with transcriptomic, biochemical, and physiological analyses. Forty-eight aquaporin genes were identified and classified into four subfamilies (15 PIPs, 19 TIPs, 8 NIPs, and 6 SIPs), with evidence of lineage-specific expansion in the PIP1 and TIP2. Expression analyses revealed clear propagation-dependent patterns. Set-derived plants displayed higher expression of AcPIP1.1, several PIP2 isoforms and most TIP2 members in both roots and leaves, consistent with enhanced water and CO2 transport, higher stomatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthetic rates. In contrast, seed-derived plants showed increased expression of specific PIPs, and several NIPs (AcNIP1.1, AcNIP3.1, AcNIP5.1, AcNIP5.2, and AcNIP2.1) associated with solute and H2O2 transport, coinciding with higher boron and hydrogen peroxide levels. These findings indicate that propagation origin is associated with alternative aquaporin-mediated transport strategies: set-derived plants favour a high-flux strategy that supports rapid growth, whereas seed-derived plants prioritize tighter internal regulation through solute redistribution and redox homeostasis. Our results provide a molecular-physiological framework linking propagation origin with resource-use strategies in onion. HighlightPropagation origin reprograms aquaporin expression in onion, generating contrasting hydraulic, metabolic and growth strategies. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=80 SRC="FIGDIR/small/728701v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c3a3a6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2d0674org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2d2cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15d2c34_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.4%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
3
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.8%
4
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
6
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
8
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
10
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
12
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
16
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
19
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
20
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
22
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%