Back

Luminance-corrected Pupillometry for Reliable Effort-tracking in Dynamic Environments

Cai, Y.; Naber, M.; Van der Stigchel, S.; Strauch, C.

2026-05-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.29.728653 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pupillometry provides an objective way to index effort across domains. However, pupil size is strongly affected by luminance changes, which can obscure effort-related effects, and limit its use in most applied scenarios with dynamic visual input. We here introduce and validate a method to overcome this problem. To this end, participants performed an auditory n-back task of differing difficulty while viewing either constant visual input or dynamic driving movie clips. Effort was assessed physiologically (pupil size), behaviorally (accuracy), and subjectively (NASA-TLX). Accuracy, questionnaire scores, and pupil size were analyzed at the session level, while pupillometry additionally provided continuous time-resolved information. As expected, pupillometry tracked differences in effort, but its discriminability was substantially reduced under dynamic visual input. Correcting for the effects of overall luminance and moment-to-moment luminance changes using a dynamic, explainable, and open-source modeling procedure (Open-DPSM) considerably improved effort discriminability on both aggregate and time-resolved levels. At the aggregate level, luminance-corrected pupillometry slightly outperformed accuracy and NASA-TLX. Combining all three measures yielded the highest classification performance (AUC = 0.98), supporting the view that effort is multifaceted and best captured multimodally. These findings establish a practical basis for fine-grained physiological tracking of effort and arousal in both fundamental and applied research using complex, dynamic stimuli. A tutorial section guides researchers in applying luminance correction to their own pupillometric data in dynamic viewing environments using the here validated approach.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
5
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
7
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
11
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
22
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%