Back

Logic of brain-wide connections with the cerebellar cortex

Clothier, S.; Kostadinov, D.; Clark, B. A.; Häusser, M.; Rossi, L. F.

2026-05-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.29.728551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The cerebellum governs movement and cognition through multiple lobules that carry distinct signals and connect to distinct long-range brain networks. How these specialized computations are reconciled with the brain-wide convergence required for coherent behaviour is unknown, in part because the input-output connectivity of functionally distinct lobules has not been mapped. We combined anterograde and retrograde transsynaptic viral tracing with whole-brain two-photon tomography to map the monosynaptic and disynaptic inputs and outputs of Lobule V (LV) and Simplex (LS), two lobules preferentially involved in movement and reward, respectively. Monosynaptic connectivity was strongly segregated: LV and LS received climbing fiber and mossy fiber inputs from largely non-overlapping source regions and projected to distinct targets within the cerebellar nuclei. In contrast, disynaptic inputs to LV- and LS-projecting olivary neurons arose from a shared set of forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain regions, with the segregation re-emerging at the level of fine-scale spatial topography within these regions. Disynaptic outputs through the cerebellar nuclei likewise overlapped more than the monosynaptic projections to the nuclei themselves. These findings reveal that overlapping brain-wide pathways interface with locally specialized monosynaptic cerebellar pathways. This organizational logic could support distinct movement- and reward-related computations in the cerebellum while distributing outputs to shared downstream networks, providing an architectural substrate for both segregating and integrating cerebellar motor and cognitive functions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.