Back

Direct and mediated effects (DME) SLCMA: a novel method for life course modelling with time-varying covariates

Beer, S.; Simpkin, A. J.; Eldeeb, S. Y.; Zar, H. J.; Stein, D. J.; Dunn, E. C.; Smith, A. D. A. C.

2026-06-06 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354427 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: In prospective cohort studies, where an exposure is collected repeatedly, interest often lies in determining whether the timing of that exposure has a differential effect on a later outcome. The Structured Life Course Modeling Approach (SLCMA), where users select between temporal hypotheses of exposure specified a priori, provides one way to analyse such longitudinal data. However, few studies using SLCMA consider the effect of time-varying covariates (TVC) which may impact associations. Methods: We present a modified version of the SLCMA - called direct and mediated effects (DME)-SLCMA - which corrects for TVC. We first develop the DME-SLCMA method, test it through simulation, and apply it to psychosocial data from the Drakenstein Child Health Study (DCHS, n=336) to investigate relationships between maternal psychopathology, TVC of socioeconomic status, and offspring depressive symptoms. Results: We found that, on average, offspring depressive symptoms score increased by 3.9% (95% CI: 1.0%-6.9%, p = 0.039) for each unit of maternal psychopathology (SRQ) at 48 months whilst adjusting for time-varying socioeconomic status (at 18, 30, 42 and 54 months). Our simulations identified several realistic scenarios where selections ignoring TVC - with TVC mediated exposure effects present - were prone to be incorrect, including our DCHS example. Conclusion: DME-SLCMA is a robust new approach for life course modelling in the presence of time-varying covariates. We recommend adjusting for TVC whenever possible, and, when not possible, our simulation study identified that scenarios where mediated effects are comparable, or greater, in magnitude to direct effects are most prone to confounding.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
10
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
11
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
15
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
17
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
22
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%