Back

A Novel Integrated Nomogram for Predicting Prognosis in Pediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Sun, H.; Dai, Z.; Tian, Z.; Wang, P.; Jia, H.; Zhang, L.; Han, B.

2026-06-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354421 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of heart failure and transplantation, with variable prognosis and high early mortality. This study developed and validated a nomogram predicting short-term mortality risk to guide clinical decisions. Methods: The data were sourced from the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Database at Shandong Provincial Hospital. Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine outcome-associated factors, and a nomogram was developed to estimate 1, 3, and 5year mortality risks for children with DCM. Model effectiveness was assessed through the concordance index (C-index) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the model's predictive accuracy and clinical relevance. Results: A cohort of 106 children diagnosed with primary DCM and who underwent genetic analysis was studied, with a median diagnostic age of 10 months (ranging from 5 to 84 months), comprising 50 girls (47.2%). The rate of detecting genetic mutations was 28.3%, uncovering 14 gene variants linked to DCM, with TTN mutations being the most common. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that both sex and NT-proBNP levels had a significant impact on survival rates among pediatric DCM patients.The model exhibited strong discriminative performance, calibration, and clinical net benefit, as assessed by the C-index, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Conclusions: The prediction model created in this research shows strong accuracy in forecasting survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for children with DCM, highlighting its significant relevance in clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.