Back

Effects of Starting and Stopping Combined Oral Contraceptives on Markers of Ovarian Reserve

Bernig, U.; Kördel, M.; Sundström-Poromaa, I.; Kroemer, N. B.; Henes, M.

2026-06-01 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354411 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective To examine the effects of combined oral contraceptive (OC) use on clinical markers of ovarian reserve by comparing Anti-Muellerian Hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), and ovarian volume (OV) before and after starting or stopping OC. Methods This analysis is based on data from a prospective cohort study conducted at the University Hospital Tubingen, Germany, as part of the IRTG-2804 project. A total of 54 healthy women were included and categorized into three groups based on their OC use status: OC starters (n = 12), stoppers (n = 16), and long-term OC-users (n = 26). Each participant underwent a transvaginal ultrasound (including AFC and OV) and serum sampling (including AMH) at two time points (S1 and S2), three to six months apart. OC starters were assessed first during the early follicular phase (day 1-7) and then during active OC intake (day 8-21), while stoppers were assessed in the reverse order. Long-term users were assessed twice during active OC intake. Results OC stoppers showed significant within-group increases in all ovarian reserve markers, including AMH ({Delta} = 2.57 ng/mL, p < .001), AFC ({Delta} = 3.88, p = .004), and OV, which almost doubled (1.94-fold increase; 95% CI [1.35, 2.80], p < .001). In contrast, OC starters exhibited a significant decline in AMH ({Delta} = -1.25 ng/mL, p = .013), but no changes in AFC or OV. No significant longitudinal changes were observed among long-term OC users. Conclusion AMH levels decrease after starting OC use whereas AFC and OV are not affected. In contrast, AMH, AFC, and OV recover within three to six months after stopping OC, suggesting a reversible suppression of ovarian reserve markers during OC use. These findings are clinically relevant for fertility counseling and for the interpretation of ovarian reserve markers in women using hormonal contraception.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
4
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
6
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
7
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
8
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
10
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
29
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%