Back

AutoClip: AI-Guided TEE Semantic Segmentation for TEER A Proof-of-Concept Study

Chen, M.; Li, X.; Yang, K.; Taramasso, M.

2026-06-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354195 medRxiv
Show abstract

**Abstract** **Background:** Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an established treatment for mitral regurgitation but remains highly dependent on operator experience and complex transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided intraprocedural imaging. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based semantic segmentation may improve procedural reproducibility and intraprocedural guidance; however, no TEER-specific segmentation framework has been reported. **Objectives:** To develop and evaluate AutoClip, a clinician-driven AI-guided TEE semantic segmentation model designed for simultaneous delineation of mitral valve anatomy and in-vivo TEER device components. **Methods:** A retrospective proof-of-concept study was conducted using 987 intraprocedural TEE frames derived from 10 video clips in 3 patients undergoing MitraClip G4 implantation. Seven semantic labels, including mitral leaflets and device components, were manually annotated using ITK-SNAP. Following standardized preprocessing and region-of-interest extraction, an Attention U-Net architecture was trained frame-wise on bicommissural and corresponding X-plane TEE views. Model performance was assessed using mean intersection-over-union (IoU) and Dice coefficient on an independent test set. **Results:** The Attention U-Net demonstrated improved sensitivity to small device structures compared with conventional U-Net architectures. Preliminary training performance achieved a mean IoU of approximately 0.93, while independent test performance reached a mean IoU of 0.46 across foreground classes. Qualitative assessment demonstrated feasible simultaneous segmentation of mitral leaflets, clip arms, grippers, and delivery shaft during TEER procedures. **Conclusions:** AutoClip represents a proof-of-concept TEER-specific TEE semantic segmentation framework initiated through a clinician-oriented workflow without formal computer science expertise. Although preliminary accuracy remains modest due to limited sample size, this study establishes a reproducible pathway for future AI-assisted intraprocedural guidance systems and larger multicenter development efforts in structural heart interventions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
5
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
14
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
27
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
30
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%