Back

Exploring Auditory Biofeedback Paradigms for Gait Training in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A User-Centered Design Study

Kantan, P. R.; Hansen, M. B.; Foldager, J. J.; Fjeldgaard, F. S.; Dahl, S.; Spaich, E. G.

2026-05-29 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.05.29.26353852 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To identify, through iterative user-centered design, the auditory biofeedback requirements and sound preferences supporting gait training in children with cerebral palsy (CP), and to determine which feedback variables, sound mappings, and sound types yield clinically viable and movement-interpretable paradigms. Methods: The iterative process spanned two prototype phases. Prototype A comprised seven paradigms demonstrated to two experienced physiotherapists (Workshop 1A). Two of these were subsequently discarded owing to poor sound-movement interpretability and two were modified. Six paradigms were added to Prototype B, demonstrated to four children, five parents, and one therapist (Workshop 1B) and two therapists (Workshop 2B). Data were analyzed using systematic text condensation. Results: Within-child sound preferences varied with energy level and sensory state on a given day. Sound-movement interpretability tended to suffer for paradigms with greater acoustic complexity (e.g. computer-generated music). Therapists endorsed a repertoire spanning both movement quality and movement quantity targets. Participants independently proposed paradigms rewarding restrained and controlled movement, a feedback category absent from the current prototype. Conclusions: Session-level calibration is preferable to fixed sound profiles, requiring real-time interface support for paradigm adjustment. Acoustic complexity must remain subordinate to movement-sound interpretability. Paradigms targeting movement restraint are a development priority unaddressed in the literature.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
4
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.8%
6
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
7
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
27
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%