Back

Exploring Auditory Biofeedback Paradigms for Gait Training in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A User-Centered Design Study

Kantan, P. R.; Hansen, M. B.; Foldager, J. J.; Fjeldgaard, F. S.; Dahl, S.; Spaich, E. G.

2026-05-29 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.05.29.26353852 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To identify, through iterative user-centered design, the auditory biofeedback requirements and sound preferences supporting gait training in children with cerebral palsy (CP), and to determine which feedback variables, sound mappings, and sound types yield clinically viable and movement-interpretable paradigms. Methods: The iterative process spanned two prototype phases. Prototype A comprised seven paradigms demonstrated to two experienced physiotherapists (Workshop 1A). Two of these were subsequently discarded owing to poor sound-movement interpretability and two were modified. Six paradigms were added to Prototype B, demonstrated to four children, five parents, and one therapist (Workshop 1B) and two therapists (Workshop 2B). Data were analyzed using systematic text condensation. Results: Within-child sound preferences varied with energy level and sensory state on a given day. Sound-movement interpretability tended to suffer for paradigms with greater acoustic complexity (e.g. computer-generated music). Therapists endorsed a repertoire spanning both movement quality and movement quantity targets. Participants independently proposed paradigms rewarding restrained and controlled movement, a feedback category absent from the current prototype. Conclusions: Session-level calibration is preferable to fixed sound profiles, requiring real-time interface support for paradigm adjustment. Acoustic complexity must remain subordinate to movement-sound interpretability. Paradigms targeting movement restraint are a development priority unaddressed in the literature.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
7
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%