Back

Cell-Free DNA Genomic and Fragmentomic Features for Early Outcome Prediction in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Wang, S.; Mapar, P.; Moldovan, N.; van der Pol, Y.; Safrastyan, A.; van Werkhoven, E.; Tantyo, N. A.; Snieder, B.; Do Brito Valente, A. F.; de Jong, A. V.; Dinmohamed, A.; Drees, E. E. E.; Roemer, M. G. M.; Ylstra, B.; Klerk, C. P. W.; Strobbe, L.; Sandberg, Y.; Boersma, R. S.; Koene, H.; Pruijt, H.; de Heer, K.; van Rijn, R.; Bilgin, Y. M.; de Jongh, E.; Nijland, M.; van der Poel, M.; Koster, A.; Nieuwenhuizen, L.; Fijnheer, R.; Beeker, A.; Mous, R.; Vergote, V. K. J.; Vermaat, J. S. P.; Pegtel, D. M.; Chamuleau, M. E. D.; Mouliere, F.

2026-05-30 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.29.26353426 medRxiv
Show abstract

Curative-intent immunochemotherapy fails in ~30% of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), yet no validated molecular tool enables early identification of high-risk individuals to guide treatment intensification. Using shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) of plasma cell-free DNA from 190 LBCL patients, we developed and validated the ACT score (Aberrations, fragment Composition, Terminal motifs), a composite classifier integrating genomic and fragmentomic features from a single post-cycle-1 sample. ACT-positive patients had worse 2-year outcomes versus ACT-negative patients: time-to-progression 29% vs. 83% (HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.9 - 10.0; P = 1.5 x 10 - 4) and overall survival 47% vs. 93% (HR 8.7, 95% CI 3.0 - 25.4; P = 1.8 x 10-6). ACT score was independently prognostic of the International Prognostic Index, and their combination identified the highest-risk patients. Unlike mutation-based approaches, this assay requires neither tumor tissue, germline control nor a baseline plasma sample. Built on open-source tools and sWGS, the ACT score offers a feasible scalable strategy for early risk stratification in aggressive LBCL.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.6%
3
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
5
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
10
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
19
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
24
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%