Back

Cell-Free DNA Genomic and Fragmentomic Features for Early Outcome Prediction in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Wang, S.; Mapar, P.; Moldovan, N.; van der Pol, Y.; Safrastyan, A.; van Werkhoven, E.; Tantyo, N. A.; Snieder, B.; Do Brito Valente, A. F.; de Jong, A. V.; Dinmohamed, A.; Drees, E. E. E.; Roemer, M. G. M.; Ylstra, B.; Klerk, C. P. W.; Strobbe, L.; Sandberg, Y.; Boersma, R. S.; Koene, H.; Pruijt, H.; de Heer, K.; van Rijn, R.; Bilgin, Y. M.; de Jongh, E.; Nijland, M.; van der Poel, M.; Koster, A.; Nieuwenhuizen, L.; Fijnheer, R.; Beeker, A.; Mous, R.; Vergote, V. K. J.; Vermaat, J. S. P.; Pegtel, D. M.; Chamuleau, M. E. D.; Mouliere, F.

2026-05-30 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.29.26353426 medRxiv
Show abstract

Curative-intent immunochemotherapy fails in ~30% of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), yet no validated molecular tool enables early identification of high-risk individuals to guide treatment intensification. Using shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) of plasma cell-free DNA from 190 LBCL patients, we developed and validated the ACT score (Aberrations, fragment Composition, Terminal motifs), a composite classifier integrating genomic and fragmentomic features from a single post-cycle-1 sample. ACT-positive patients had worse 2-year outcomes versus ACT-negative patients: time-to-progression 29% vs. 83% (HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.9 - 10.0; P = 1.5 x 10 - 4) and overall survival 47% vs. 93% (HR 8.7, 95% CI 3.0 - 25.4; P = 1.8 x 10-6). ACT score was independently prognostic of the International Prognostic Index, and their combination identified the highest-risk patients. Unlike mutation-based approaches, this assay requires neither tumor tissue, germline control nor a baseline plasma sample. Built on open-source tools and sWGS, the ACT score offers a feasible scalable strategy for early risk stratification in aggressive LBCL.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.0%
5
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Blood Cancer Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
7
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
11
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%
24
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%