Back

Directed cortical connectivity inferred from neural energy metabolism

Belenya, R.; Epp, S.; Bose, A.; Hechler, A.; Fraticelli, L.; Ashrafi, M.; Ranft, A.; Yakushev, I.; Kurcyus, K.; Castrillon, G.; Riedl, V.

2026-05-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.28.728560 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) from resting-state fMRI captures temporal correlations between brain regions but cannot reveal the direction of neural signalling. Determining effective connectivity, the influence of one neural system over another, is essential for understanding cortical hierarchy and its energetic constraints. We extend Metabolic Connectivity Mapping (MCM; Riedl et al., 2016), a biologically grounded framework that infers directionality by integrating FC with glucose metabolism measured via [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG PET). MCM builds on the principle that postsynaptic neurons consume more energy than presynaptic ones (Attwell and Laughlin, 2001; Attwell and Gibb, 2005), linking higher local metabolism to afferent input. Here, we present a new whole-cortex implementation that estimates directed connectivity directly from inter-regional energy ratios, enabling application to multimodal and fMRI-only datasets using an average cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlc) map. The model reproduces hierarchical signalling within visual and sensorimotor systems and identifies novel directional asymmetries along sensory-cognitive gradients. MCM-derived metrics correlate with independent biological markers, including mitochondrial density (Mosharov et al., 2025) and cortical cytoarchitecture indexed by cell layer profiles (Amunts and Zilles, 2015; Wagstyl et al., 2020). By decomposing functional connectivity into metabolically constrained directed and undirected components, this framework bridges the gap between statistical connectivity and neuroenergetic mechanisms. Our results position MCM as a scalable and biologically interpretable model for inferring directed brain connectivity from human neuroimaging data.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
3
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
8
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.3%
9
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.7%
13
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
15
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
19
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%