Back

Evaluating Spike Antigenicity across Endemic Human Coronavirus Models using Flow Virometry

Burnie, J.; Ouano, C.; Luo, V.; Dzuvor, C. K. O.; Miller, T.; Ospina, G.; Tanneti, N. S.; Tan, L. H.; Hamel, D. J.; Hammond, C.; Matthews, H.; Evanson, L. R.; Joseph, J.; Moak, S. P.; Kanki, P.; Cohen, N. A.; Weiss, S. R.; Corbett-Helaire, K. S.

2026-05-29 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.28.728498 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While SARS-CoV-2 research has advanced rapidly since COVID-19, endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs) remain comparatively understudied. Tools to phenotype spike (S), the primary antigenic target on coronaviruses, at the single-virion level could improve vaccine design by capturing variation in epitope availability and spike abundance. Here, we establish a calibrated flow virometry (FV) platform to quantify S antigenicity on native endemic (HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43) and epidemic (SARS-CoV-2) coronaviruses directly in cell culture supernatants. FV revealed cell line-dependent differences in S antigenicity, including receptor-induced changes in epitope accessibility. Comparison of virion-associated S with recombinant stabilized S by ELISA and biolayer interferometry showed consistent binding for HCoV-OC43, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, but differences for HCoV-229E, with FV resolving heterogeneity not captured by bulk assays. Finally, FV showed that HCoV-229E from patient-derived air-liquid interface cultures exhibited reduced antibody binding and distinct S antigenicity compared to cell line-derived virions. Together, these findings establish FV as a platform for single-virion analysis of HCoV antigenicity.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
2
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.9%
6
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.1%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
15
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.9%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
26
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%