Back

Quantifying circulation and antibody cross-reactivity for co-circulating flaviviruses: the case of Usutu and West Nile virus in blackbirds

de Wit, M. M.; Hoze, N.; De Jong, M. C. M.; Koopmans, M.; van Mastrigt, T.; Sikkema, R.; ten Bosch, Q.

2026-05-29 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.28.728479 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Serological testing is important for assessing past exposure and immunity, but interpretation can be complicated by antibody cross-reactivity between closely related viruses. We assess this challenge for Usutu virus (USUV) and West Nile virus (WNV), flaviviruses that recently emerged in Europe. We analysed samples from wild blackbirds collected in the Netherlands between 2016-2022. Samples (N=1742) were screened using an NS1-based protein micro-array, with positives confirmed by Focus Reduction Neutralization Tests (FRNT). We jointly estimated seroprevalence and antibody responses by fitting a Bayesian latent-variable model to FRNT values. Estimates of homologous and cross-reactive antibody responses were used to improve interpretation of observed titres for serosurveillance. Estimated seroprevalence varied across time and regions between 4.9% (95%CrI 3.5-6.7) to 18.5% (95%CrI 14.9-22.7) for USUV and between 2.4% (95%CrI 1.3-3.8) to 6.4% (95%CrI 3.9-9.6) for WNV. These were 1.5 (USUV) to 2.4 times (WNV) higher than estimates based on the current threshold-based algorithm. USUV induced a higher antibody response and was more likely to induce a cross-reactive response than WNV. Our classification algorithm informed by these estimates showed high sensitivity (WNV: 0.88, USUV: 0.97) and specificity (both: >0.99). Our results illustrate how quantitative frameworks can improve serological interpretation in settings with co-circulating pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 7%
18.2%
2
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.2%
6
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
12
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%