Back

Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs) in NONMEM for Probing Population Pharmacokinetic Model Misspecification: Diagnostic Utility, Practical Considerations, and Future Directions

Chen, P.; Bauer, R. J.; Li, Y.

2026-06-01 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.05.28.728340 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models are commonly developed using ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to describe deterministic concentration-time profiles, with unexplained variability typically attributed to interindividual variability or residual error. When model misspecification is present, system-level deviations may be absorbed into these conventional variability terms, making the source and magnitude of model inadequacy difficult to assess quantitatively. Stochastic differential equations (SDEs) provide an alternative framework by introducing an explicit system-noise component into the structural model, allowing model-data mismatch to be evaluated more directly. However, historical implementation of SDE-based models in NONMEM has been technically challenging. The availability of the Fortran plug-in subroutine SDE.f90 substantially lowers this barrier and enables more practical implementation of SDE-based models in NONMEM. In this work, SDE-based nonlinear mixed-effects models were evaluated as a quantitative diagnostic framework for probing popPK model misspecification. The SDE.f90 implementation was first verified using simulated one-compartment intravenous bolus datasets with stochastic process noise. Additional simulation-estimation scenarios were then conducted under intentionally misspecified structural or stochastic assumptions, including time-varying elimination, compartmental misspecification, and residual error misspecification. Across these scenarios, the estimated system-noise parameter was generally sensitive to misspecification, with larger values usually associated with greater structural or stochastic mismatch. SDE-based modeling also helped partially separate system-level variability from residual variability and, in selected settings, supported localization of misspecification to specific model components, thereby helping guide model refinement. Overall, SDE-based popPK modeling is a useful addition to the pharmacometric diagnostic toolbox, with system-noise estimates best interpreted together with structural model evaluation, residual diagnostics, parameter behavior, and pharmacologic plausibility.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.0%
5
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
10
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%