Back

Gap junctional coupling of molecular layer interneurons enables transient NMDA driven synchronization

Koch, N. A.; Khadra, A.

2026-05-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.28.728326 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular layer interneurons (MLIs) play a crucial role in modulating the output of the cerebellar cortex through their inhibition of Purkinje cells. MLIs also inhibit other MLIs synaptically and are coupled electrically through gap junctions. While synchronization of MLIs has been observed, comprehensive understanding of the role of gap junctional coupling in shaping MLI network activity is lacking. Dendro-dendritic gap junctional coupling in MLIs involves propagation of signals to and from the dendritic gap junction location which can lead to neural synchronization. However, how this is regulated by the intrinsic electrical properties of MLIs, including dendritic properties, is poorly understood. In this study, we apply conductance-based computational modelling to examine the effect of dendritic filtering on gap junctional coupling in pairs of ball-and-stick MLI models, demonstrating that gap junctional properties, rather than the active dendritic properties of MLIs, primarily dictate gap junction-driven synchronization. By systematically reducing the ball-and-stick model to a one-compartment MLI model, we additionally investigate the role of MLI gap junctional coupling in mediating MLI network synchrony. Our results reveal that transient AMPA input drives brief network-wide synchronization, whereas NMDA-mediated elevated firing enables gap junction-dependent oscillatory synchronization that is further enhanced by MLI-MLI inhibition in a positive feedback loop, producing pronounced peaks of network coactivity resembling sensory-evoked MLI activity observed in vivo. These findings provide important insights into network dynamics of MLIs and how gap junctions shape their activity, with broader implications for other neural networks that rely on gap junctional coupling.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
22.6%
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.2%
4
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
10
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
17
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.5%
28
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%