Back

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is associated with post-stroke cognitive impairment

Moncion, K.; Rodrigues, L.; de las Heras, B.; Abreu, J.; Sikorska, K.; Sutoski, A.; MacDonald, M. J.; Tang, A.; Roig, M.

2026-06-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354397 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Up to 70% of stroke survivors develop cognitive impairment, yet clinicians lack non-invasive vascular biomarkers that could meaningfully inform risk stratification. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), the gold-standard measurement of central arterial stiffness, is a novel biomarker of vascular aging linked to cognitive impairment. This study evaluated the association between cfPWV and post-stroke cognitive impairment, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), in individuals [≥]6 months post-stroke. Methods. This is a secondary cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized control trial. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between cfPWV (m/s) and MoCA score at the primary cut point of [≤]26/30, with secondary cut points of [≤]24/30 and [≤]22/30. Models were adjusted for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, type-2 diabetes, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and smoking status. Results. Of 82 participants enrolled in the main trial, 68 participants (n = 45 males, age 64.6 {+/-} 9.6 years, 1.8 {+/-} 1.2 years post-stroke) with mild-to-moderate stroke severity (NIHSS median [IQR] = 1 [2]) were included. In the fully adjusted model using the MoCA [≤]26/30 cut point, each 1 m/s increase in cfPWV was associated with a 35% increase in the odds of post-stroke cognitive impairment (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.35; 95% CI 1.06, 1.81; p = 0.027; Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.77). Consistent associations were observed at the MoCA [≤]24/30 (aOR = 1.41; 95% CI 1.04, 2.01; p = 0.037; AUC = 0.88) and MoCA [≤]22/30 (aOR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.03, 1.79; p = 0.039; AUC = 0.82) cut points. Conclusions. Higher cfPWV was independently associated with post-stroke cognitive impairment across clinically referenced MoCA cut points. cfPWV may be a complementary vascular biomarker to support cognitive risk stratification and identify stroke survivors who could benefit from closer monitoring or vascular-targeted intervention.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.8%
4
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
6
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
11
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
12
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
21
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%