Personalized clinical reference intervals for routine precision medical care
Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.-L.; Jamilov, A.; Liu, E.; Shree, S.; Lam, B. D.; Foy, B. H.
Show abstract
Most routine clinical markers are interpreted using population-based reference intervals, despite being regulated around patient-specific homeostatic setpoints. This mismatch obscures physiologic shifts, inhibiting detection of early disease signatures. Here, we develop a novel Bayesian inference method that adaptively constructs personalized reference intervals using each patients existing health records. In analysis of >100 million lab tests in >800,000 patients, these personalized intervals can be accurately constructed with only minimal prior data, meaning this method can be applied near universally. We show that across 43 common lab markers, patient setpoints are strongly associated with future morbidity, with signal strength increasing as more test data is collected. Deviation from personalized reference intervals provides strong and novel risk signatures across diverse disease states, including hypothyroidism, hematologic cancers, kidney disease, and pregnancy complications. Importantly, personalized reference intervals capture a different risk signature to existing population-based approaches, with the highest risk patients being those who deviate from both intervals simultaneously. In a targeted clinical use case study of iron infusion, use of personalized reference intervals greatly improved prediction of treatment efficacy and allowed precise tracking of treatment responses. Our results illustrate how existing health records can be used to construct personalized benchmarks for nearly all common clinical tests, driving a new paradigm for precision laboratory medicine.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Complex patterns of multimorbidity associated with severe COVID-19 and Long COVID 92%
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 92%
- Blood and tissue correlates of steroid non-response in checkpoint inhibition-induced immune-related adverse events 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide polygenic score with APOL1 risk genotypes predicts chronic kidney disease across major continental ancestries 93%
- A Neanderthal OAS1 isoform Protects Against COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity: Results from Mendelian Randomization and Case-Control Studies 92%
- Actionable druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies repurposing opportunities for COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody therapy reverses biological signatures of COVID-19 progression 94%
- Longitudinal characterization of circulating neutrophils uncovers distinct phenotypes associated with disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 93%
- Crowdsourcing assessment of maternal blood multi-omics for predicting gestational age and preterm birth 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.