Back

Personalized clinical reference intervals for routine precision medical care

Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.-L.; Jamilov, A.; Liu, E.; Shree, S.; Lam, B. D.; Foy, B. H.

2026-05-30 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354363 medRxiv
Show abstract

Most routine clinical markers are interpreted using population-based reference intervals, despite being regulated around patient-specific homeostatic setpoints. This mismatch obscures physiologic shifts, inhibiting detection of early disease signatures. Here, we develop a novel Bayesian inference method that adaptively constructs personalized reference intervals using each patients existing health records. In analysis of >100 million lab tests in >800,000 patients, these personalized intervals can be accurately constructed with only minimal prior data, meaning this method can be applied near universally. We show that across 43 common lab markers, patient setpoints are strongly associated with future morbidity, with signal strength increasing as more test data is collected. Deviation from personalized reference intervals provides strong and novel risk signatures across diverse disease states, including hypothyroidism, hematologic cancers, kidney disease, and pregnancy complications. Importantly, personalized reference intervals capture a different risk signature to existing population-based approaches, with the highest risk patients being those who deviate from both intervals simultaneously. In a targeted clinical use case study of iron infusion, use of personalized reference intervals greatly improved prediction of treatment efficacy and allowed precise tracking of treatment responses. Our results illustrate how existing health records can be used to construct personalized benchmarks for nearly all common clinical tests, driving a new paradigm for precision laboratory medicine.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
5
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
8
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
18
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
21
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
29
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%