Back

COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in children under 5 in the USA: a test-negative case-control study

Silverman, R. A.; Ahrens, M. L.; Helmick, M.; Finkielstein, C. V.; Cohen, A.; Short, E.; Bordwine, P.

2026-05-30 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354328 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) continues to mutate, circulate, and adversely impact health and quality of life. While COVID-19 vaccines remain safe and effective, uptake remains low, especially among children, the youngest of whom were not vaccine-eligible until after Omicron and are underrepresented in published research. This study estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) among under-5-year-olds. Methods: We used Virginia Department of Health surveillance data from June 2022 through October 2022 to conduct a test negative case-control study. We estimated VE derived from odds ratios (ORs) of reported infections using logistic regression among children aged 6-months to 5-years. Results: Using the earliest positive (cases) or negative (controls) post-vaccine-eligible test results, the VE associated with two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine was 78% (95% CI=45%, 93%; p=0.004) in unadjusted analyses and 70% (95% CI=25%, 91%, p=0.023) when adjusting for age, sex, prior testing behavior, and prior reported infections. The adjusted VE was 74% (95% CI=28%, 94%; p=0.025) among those with no prior positives reported and 45% (95% CI=-302%, 97%; p=0.569) among those with a prior positive reported. Conclusions: These results show that even though the vaccine was not closely matched to the dominant variants circulating during the time period analyzed, it was effective at reducing the risk of reported infections. This study adds to the body of knowledge on pediatric COVID-19 VE in an underrepresented age-group and in a rural region, illustrates the utility of surveillance data for evaluation, and can inform vaccine decisions to improve vaccine uptake for young children.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.2%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.0%
4
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
7
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
9
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%