Back

COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in children under 5 in the USA: a test-negative case-control study

Silverman, R. A.; Ahrens, M. L.; Helmick, M.; Finkielstein, C. V.; Cohen, A.; Short, E.; Bordwine, P.

2026-05-30 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354328 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) continues to mutate, circulate, and adversely impact health and quality of life. While COVID-19 vaccines remain safe and effective, uptake remains low, especially among children, the youngest of whom were not vaccine-eligible until after Omicron and are underrepresented in published research. This study estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) among under-5-year-olds. Methods: We used Virginia Department of Health surveillance data from June 2022 through October 2022 to conduct a test negative case-control study. We estimated VE derived from odds ratios (ORs) of reported infections using logistic regression among children aged 6-months to 5-years. Results: Using the earliest positive (cases) or negative (controls) post-vaccine-eligible test results, the VE associated with two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine was 78% (95% CI=45%, 93%; p=0.004) in unadjusted analyses and 70% (95% CI=25%, 91%, p=0.023) when adjusting for age, sex, prior testing behavior, and prior reported infections. The adjusted VE was 74% (95% CI=28%, 94%; p=0.025) among those with no prior positives reported and 45% (95% CI=-302%, 97%; p=0.569) among those with a prior positive reported. Conclusions: These results show that even though the vaccine was not closely matched to the dominant variants circulating during the time period analyzed, it was effective at reducing the risk of reported infections. This study adds to the body of knowledge on pediatric COVID-19 VE in an underrepresented age-group and in a rural region, illustrates the utility of surveillance data for evaluation, and can inform vaccine decisions to improve vaccine uptake for young children.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.8%
2
Vaccine: X
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.8%
4
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
Pediatrics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
6
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
7
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.1%
24
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%