Outcomes of planned caesarean birth compared with planned or actual vaginal birth: an update and expansion of the NICE Caesarean Birth Guideline systematic review NG192
Black, M.; Robertson, C.; Cruickshank, M.; Ekong, A.; Manson, P.; Kemakolam, O.; Steel, O.; Richards, C.; Harshani, P.; Merriel, A.; Devane, D.; Bhattacharya, S.; Williams, D.; Brazzelli, M.
Show abstract
Background Planned caesarean birth (CB) is an increasingly utilised intervention, observed in almost 1 in 6 first-time mothers giving birth in the UK in 2023-24. Outcomes of planned (or actual) CB have been compared with planned (or actual) vaginal birth (VB) in a UK national guideline, but the scope of the comparison does not fully reflect the range of outcomes of interest to stakeholders. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of outcomes of planned or actual CB with planned or actual VB to shape information resources which support informed birth planning. Methods The UK NICE Caesarean Birth Guideline NG192 evidence review of outcomes associated with planned CB (or actual CB where no planned CB data was available) was updated and expanded to incorporate additional outcomes prioritised by stakeholders. Results A total of 33 new study reports were combined with 32 reports previously included in NG192. All new reports were observational cohort studies or systematic reviews at low risk of bias. Only 3 studies reported outcomes of planned CB compared with planned VB (regardless of actual mode of birth), whereas all remaining studies reported actual VB outcomes. Planned CB was followed by more maternal infection (wound infection, mastitis, endometritis and urinary tract), venous thrombosis and lower neonatal unit admission rates than a planned VB. In the long-term, CB was linked to one or more sexual problems (insufficient lubrication and dyspareunia) being more common, future pregnancy being less common, and infertility being more frequent than after VB. For offspring, infant urinary tract infection after any CB, gastrointestinal tract infections and autism after planned CB were more common compared with VB. New findings highlight conflicting reports on childhood asthma and type 1 diabetes risk after planned CB, suggesting that prior positive associations may be explained by confounding. Existing evidence in NG192 suggests that cardiac arrest, maternal death and hysterectomy are more common after planned CB, but arise from studies at high risk of bias. NG192 also reports that placenta accreta and uterine rupture in a future pregnancy are more common after any CB. No new evidence was identified on these outcomes. Conclusion This review provides stakeholder-relevant information to populate decision-support materials on outcomes of planned (and actual) CB compared with planned (and actual) VB. The existing evidence base lacks data on long-term outcomes of planned (rather than actual) VB.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neonatal outcomes and indirect consequences following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A systematic review 95%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- The effect of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on birth weight in Ethiopia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction in Spontaneous and Iatrogenic Preterm Births in Twin Pregnancies During COVID-19 Lockdown in Melbourne, Australia: A Multicenter Cohort Study 96%
- The prevalence of mental ill-health in women during pregnancy and after childbirth during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis 94%
- Corticosteroids for improving patient relevant outcomes in HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of caesarean birth on perinatal mortality for singleton breech presentation in spontaneous preterm labour – a target trial emulation using Scottish health record data 97%
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 95%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review 92%
- Effect of Midwife-Led Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Prolapse Symptoms and Quality of Life in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Ethiopia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 95%
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: A wide-angled Mendelian randomization study 91%
- Establishing the causal role of intimate partner violence and abuse on depressive symptoms in young adults: a population-based cohort study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.