Back

Genotype and methylation interact to reconfigure transcriptional regulation in colorectal cancer

Kim, B.; Kim, H.; Kwon, M.-K.; Hannenhalli, S.; Choi, S. S.

2026-05-30 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.27.728350 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscriptional regulation is shaped by both genomic variants and the environment. Yet, how the regulatory effects of genomic variants are reconfigured by dynamic epigenomic changes during tumorigenesis remains incompletely understood. MethodsWe investigated methylation context-dependent links between genotype and gene expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) using paired tumor and normal-adjacent tissue (NAT) from 80 patients, thereby controlling for germline genomic background. By integrating promoter-targeted bisulfite sequencing with RNA-seq, we systematically compared expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTLs). To capture regulatory complexity beyond simple mediation, we implemented a memo-eQTL framework that explicitly models genotype x DNA methylation (GxM) interactions. ResultsWe observed extensive tissue specificity in both eQTL and mQTL landscapes; tumor-specific eGenes were significantly enriched for hallmark oncogenic pathways, including WNT and MAPK signaling. Standard mediation models explained only a minority of genotype-expression relationships, whereas our explicit interaction framework revealed widespread reconfiguration of methylation-dependent genetic effects in tumors. Memo-eQTL mapping (FDR < 0.05) identified 18 NAT and 73 tumor eGenes with significant GxM interactions, and results were consistent at a more permissive threshold (FDR < 0.2). We further developed a patient-level memo-eQTL score and found that interaction-based regulatory disruption in NAT, but not in tumor, significantly correlated with clinical stage (P = 0.035). ConclusionsGenetic regulation in cancer is reorganized through context-dependent GxM interactions. Importantly, GxM signatures in NAT are specifically linked to disease progression, offering new insights into field cancerization and the clinical consequences of regulatory reprogramming in CRC.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.5%
3
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.4%
6
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.3%
11
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
14
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
20
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.2%
22
NAR Cancer
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
28
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%