Back

Engagement-Dependent Neural Entrainment Underlies Dissociable tACS Effects on Item and Sequence Working Memory

Shi, L.; Xue, G.

2026-06-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.27.728324 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central challenge in neuromodulation research is to elucidate how exogenous electrical stimulation interacts with endogenous neural dynamics to shape cognitive function. Drawing on empirical evidence for dissociable oscillatory mechanisms underpinning item versus sequence working memory (WM), we employed transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to establish a causal separation and characterize the underlying neurophysiological basis. We observed a clear behavioral and neural dissociation: prefrontal 6-Hz theta stimulation selectively enhanced item WM, whereas frontoparietal in-phase theta stimulation specifically improved sequence WM. MEG further revealed task-specific modulation effects: during sequence WM, where frontoparietal theta synchrony predicted memory success, in-phase theta stimulation selectively amplified inter-regional synchronization. In contrast, during item WM, where local theta power was indicative of memory success, the identical stimulation overall exerted no significant modulation effect. Critically, across both tasks and oscillatory measures (inter-regional synchronization and theta power), the magnitude of stimulation-induced modulation scaled with each regions or connections contribution to memory performance, indicating that tACS proportionately amplifies actively engaged oscillatory processes. This engagement-dependent principle explains task- and region-specific neurophysiological effects and the variability in behavioral outcomes, providing a framework for designing precise, functionally aligned stimulation protocols to enhance translational efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.