Back

TEX15 safeguards neuronal diversity in the mouse olfactory system

Yusuf, N.; Brann, D. H.; Sun, C.; Danoff, J.; Irvine, A.; Patel, H.; Ghali, N. B.; Kahiapo, J.; Yang, J.; Datta, S. R.; Wang, J. R.; Monahan, K.

2026-05-30 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.27.728302 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animal chemosensory systems discriminate between complex mixtures of chemical compounds by leveraging large repertoires of chemoreceptor proteins. To organize information from many receptors, these systems often employ a one-receptor-type per cell organization (Fulton et al. 2024). This structure requires a gene regulatory mechanism that can coordinate the generation of many distinct types of sensory neurons, each expressing a different receptor (Yusuf and Monahan 2024; Danoff et al. 2025; Pourmorady and Lomvardas 2022; Bashkirova and Lomvardas 2019; Monahan and Lomvardas 2015; Brann and Datta 2020). Here we show that testis-expressed gene 15 (Tex15) is a critical component in an epigenetic mechanism that safeguards diverse olfactory receptor (OR) choice in the mouse olfactory system. Tex15 is required to inhibit an initial wave of olfactory receptor gene transcription that occurs as olfactory sensory neuron progenitors differentiate. In Tex15 knockout (Tex15-/-) mice, this repression fails: the early-transcribed OR genes get expressed at abnormally high levels, get chosen at high rates, and come to dominate the neuronal population. This results in a profound reduction in the diversity of OR gene choice and disrupted spatial patterning of the olfactory epithelium, while maintaining the expression of one receptor per cell. These changes in OR gene expression are accompanied by reduced deposition of H3K9me3 heterochromatin on OR genes and the preferential formation of interchromosomal enhancer hubs around the dominant ORs. We propose that Tex15 directs a heterochromatin-based transcriptional repression mechanism that counter-balances early OR transcription, thereby preventing the heterogeneous onset of OR transcription from skewing OR choice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 3%
18.4%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
8.9%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.9%
4
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
5
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
6
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.7%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
13
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
17
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
19
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Developmental Cell
196 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%
27
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
30
Nature Cell Biology
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%