Back

Pleiotropy constrains the evolution of immune system plasticity while promoting domain modularity

Asgari, D.; Tate, A. T.

2026-05-29 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.27.728286 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pleiotropic genes control multiple traits. This can result in evolutionary antagonism because adaptation that favors one trait can interfere with the function of another. While pleiotropic genes show statistical signatures of evolutionary constraint, many of them contain multiple domains that may evolve under different selective pressures. This could either strengthen or alleviate gene-level constraint. Here, we study pleiotropy within the immune system of six Drosophila species to disentangle gene and domain-level evolution. We hypothesized that the multifunctional nature of pleiotropic genes may promote within-gene variation in evolutionary rates of their domains compared to non-pleiotropic genes. Consistently, we found a greater within-gene variation in evolutionary rate among domains of pleiotropic genes than other gene classes, despite relatively low between-gene variation in evolutionary rates among pleiotropic genes. Non-pleiotropic genes, on the other hand, show a more heterogeneous selective pressure at the gene level. Regardless of pleiotropy status, domains within antiviral proteins show elevated evolutionary rates, while signaling protein domains show elevated ratios of radical to conservative amino acid substitutions, which likely have a significant effect on protein structure and function. Finally, an examination of plasticity in infection-induced gene expression responses across species revealed that non-pleiotropic genes with elevated evolutionary rates were also more likely to demonstrate variation in plasticity, but this relationship did not extend to pleiotropic genes. Overall, our results identify differences in evolutionary patterns across various biological levels (i.e., gene, domain, protein, and expression), showing that domain-specific evolution can potentially alleviate gene-level constraints.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.7%
2
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.5%
4
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 23%
5.2%
8
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
9
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
10
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
15
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
21
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%
28
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%