Back

Allele-specific expression reveals complex cis- and trans-regulatory divergence underlying fruit phenotypic differences between cultivated and wild tomato species

Zhao, J.; Nicolas, P.; Xu, Y.; Vrebalov, J.; Giovannoni, J. J.; Fei, Z.; Catala, C.

2026-05-30 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.27.728279 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the most important agricultural crops and serves as a model system for fleshy fruit biology. However, domestication bottlenecks have led to limited genetic diversity for further crop improvement. Wild relatives represent a rich reservoir of phenotypic diversity, yet the molecular basis underlying such phenotypic diversity remains largely unknown. As gene expression variation is a major driver of phenotypic diversity, we performed genome-wide allele-specific expression analyses in F1 hybrids between cultivated tomato and three wild relatives spanning a range of evolutionary distances, across three fruit tissues and multiple developmental stages. Our analysis generated a multi-species map of cis - and trans-regulatory variation, revealing a predominant role of cis-regulatory effects in expression divergence across species, tissues, and stages. The majority of cis effects were tissue- and/or stage-specific, underscoring the importance of tissue context in regulatory variation. Regulatory mechanisms and inheritance patterns shifted with evolutionary distance, with more distantly related species showing increased cis-regulatory contributions. Finally, we identified extensive regulatory divergence in biosynthetic pathways related to fruit nutritional value and flavor quality, including carotenoids, flavonoids, alkaloids, sugars, and volatiles. This study presents a high-resolution map of regulatory variation underlying tomato fruit development and provides evolutionary insights into the regulation of fruit nutrition and flavor traits.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
2
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
9.6%
3
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.7%
6
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
9
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.7%
11
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
15
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
16
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
17
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
18
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
21
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
22
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
24
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
26
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%