Cooperative FOXA1-HNF4A binding emerges from motif spacing and nucleosome architecture
Wilson, P. D.; Buck, M. J.
Show abstract
The pioneer factor hypothesis posits that specialized transcription factors access nucleosomal DNA to enable binding of secondary factors, implying a hierarchical mechanism of chromatin opening. However, recent evidence indicates that cooperative binding between pioneer and non-pioneer factors can occur in a context-dependent manner. Here we define the sequence and chromatin features that specify cooperative binding between FOXA1 and HNF4A. Using dual-induction of FOXA1 and HNF4A in naive cells, which lack endogenous expression of either factor, we identify a class of genomic sites that require both factors for binding and reside in initially inaccessible chromatin. A dual-head convolutional neural network finds no novel composite motif at these sites, instead implicating motif arrangement as the distinguishing feature. Cooperative loci are enriched for FOXA1-HNF4A motif pairs spaced 15-60 bp apart, a soft-syntax grammar consistent with nucleosome-mediated cooperativity. This spacing signature recurs at endogenously co-bound sites in HepG2 cells and primary fetal hepatocytes. Using a multiplexed in vitro nucleosome-binding assay (Pioneer-seq), we show that FOXA1 binds nucleosomal DNA more strongly than HNF4A across positions, and that cooperative binding strength on natural nucleosome sequences is predicted primarily by the position of the FOXA1 motif relative to the nucleosome dyad. Together, these results support a model in which positioned nucleosomes act as scaffolds that facilitate cooperative transcription factor binding through spatial motif organization, rather than a barrier one factor clears for the other.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine-mapping of nuclear compartments using ultra-deep Hi-C shows that active promoter and enhancer elements localize in the active A compartment even when adjacent sequences do not 98%
- Gapped-kmer sequence modeling robustly identifies regulatory vocabularies and distal enhancers conserved between evolutionarily distant mammals 97%
- Histone exchange sensors reveal variant specific dynamics in mouse embryonic stem cells 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of enhancers 97%
- ChIP-DIP: A multiplexed method for mapping hundreds of proteins to DNA uncovers diverse regulatory elements controlling gene expression 97%
- Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromatin-dependent motif syntax defines differentiation trajectories 98%
- Systematic Dissection of Sequence Features Affecting the Binding Specificity of a Pioneer Factor Reveals Binding Synergy Between FOXA1 and AP-1 97%
- Putative Looping Factor ZNF143/ZFP143 is an Essential Transcriptional Regulator with No Looping Function 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Binding domain mutations provide insight into CTCF's relationship with chromatin and its contribution to gene regulation 97%
- Comprehensive locus-specific L1 DNA methylation profiling reveals the epigenetic and transcriptional interplay between L1s and their integration sites. 97%
- Interpretable deep learning reveals the sequence rules of Hippo signaling 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.