Back

Epidermal microstructure and tactile sensitivity in the glabrous skin of hands and feet

Hall, J. R.; Gonzalez Salas Duhne, G.; Wallis, O. M.; Howarth, C.; Saal, H. P.

2026-05-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.27.728083 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glabrous skin on the human palms and soles is specialised for mechanical interaction and is characterised by papillary ridges, an absence of hair follicles, and a thick stratum corneum. While gross morphological differences, such as the increased thickness of the plantar stratum corneum, are well-documented, the fine-scale structural features associated with individual ridges and whether they help explain differences in tactile perception remain poorly understood. Here, we employed optical coherence tomography, automated image segmentation, and 3D reconstruction to generate high-resolution models of the stratum corneum and viable epidermis across six sites on the hand and foot for 27 participants. Our morphological analysis revealed that while the stratum corneum was thicker on the foot sole than the hand, the thickness of the viable epidermis remained remarkably consistent across all sites. Furthermore, papillary ridge width increased in a distal-to-proximal fashion and was larger on the foot. We also found that internal ridge architecture was considerably more pronounced than the topography observable on the skin surface. Correlating these structural parameters with psychophysical measures, specifically absolute force and two-point discrimination thresholds, demonstrated distinct drivers for tactile sensitivity. Force thresholds were primarily governed by a combination of skin thickness and innervation density, and additionally on the foot by papillary ridge width and internal ridge depth. In contrast, spatial acuity was best predicted by innervation and papillary ridge width. These findings provide a precise quantification of glabrous skin morphology and offer new insights into the process of mechanotransduction by highlighting how tissue architecture might contribute to human tactile perception.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.6%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
5
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
18
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Matrix Biology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%