Back

Bayesian optimisation and graph-based rheology enable sequence-dependent modelling of DNA materials

Gadzekpo, A.; Hilbert, L.

2026-05-30 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.27.728076 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bridging molecular and emergent properties is essential for designing soft matter. Synthetic DNA materials are attractive in this context because their sequence design space supports a wide range of material properties. Targeted design of DNA materials is hindered by scale differences and manual exploration of vast design spaces. We address this challenge with a computational workflow that links sequence-level design to rheological material properties. Concretely, we use machine learning to parametrise scalable, DNA-sequence-aware simulations, which we then evaluate using graph-based rheology. In our example, we study materials composed of self-interacting, multivalent DNA nanostars assembled from single strands. Structure and flexibility of nanostars are quantified with nucleotide-level oxDNA simulations, enabling Bayesian optimisation of a more coarse-grained bead-spring model. The bead-spring model allows efficient simulation of network formation between nanostars, governed by hybridisation free energies, which are computed with oxDNA and NUPACK. Nanostar valency and network connectivity are translated into rheological material properties with a graph-based method that we extend to include hydrodynamic interactions, yielding good agreement with experimental reference data. We generalise our findings by analysing theoretical graph representations of DNA materials and show how machine learning can optimise sequence affinities to produce desired rheological responses. Our work illustrates how machine learning can bridge scales and automate coarse-graining to facilitate targeted design of DNA materials through sequence-property relationships. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/728076v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@20b8c6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@42f843org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b90119org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f72d66_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.2%
2
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
7
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
9
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
12
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
15
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
18
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
22
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
24
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
26
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
27
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
29
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
30
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%