Back

Integrated Transcriptomic and Functional Analysis Reveals Tissue-Specific Molecular Pathology in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Ramkhalawan, D.; Parrales, P.; Koesterich, J.; Montoya-Vazquez, G.; Cuna, C.; Kreimer, A.; McQuerry, J.; Ihnow, S.; Makki, N.

2026-05-29 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.27.727643 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the spontaneous development of a lateral spine curvature during puberty, is the most common pediatric spine disorder, affecting [~]3% of children worldwide. As the underlying etiology remains unclear, AIS is treated purely symptomatically, initially by bracing and ultimately by highly invasive, costly surgeries. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous risk loci in non-coding genomic regions, making it difficult to link them to a biological function. To address this, we performed a multi-tissue investigation to connect genetic risk to tissue-specific molecular pathology. We conducted RNA sequencing on the primary tissues implicated in AIS, paraspinal muscle and spinal cartilage, from patients and unaffected controls. In paraspinal muscle, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) enriched for pathways related to muscle structure, myogenesis, and metabolism. Key upregulated genes include the transcription factor EGR1 and structural components such as MYH1. In spinal cartilage, we found enrichment of genes related to TGF{beta} and FoxO signaling, as well as metabolic pathways. Notably, genes crucial for chondrocyte differentiation (e.g. SOX5 and SOX6) were significantly downregulated. We then examined genes at known GWAS loci and found that several risk-associated genes were differentially expressed in one or both tissues. To investigate the function of non-coding variants at these loci, we identified and validated several enhancer elements harboring AIS risk SNPs at the BCL2, ADGRG6, BNC2, and FTO loci. We reveal distinct pathological signatures in muscle and cartilage and lay the foundation for connecting non-coding genetic risk to the dysregulation of key developmental and structural pathways.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 8%
17.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.1%
4
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.3%
6
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
8
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
10
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
12
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
14
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
19
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
21
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
24
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%