Back

Advanced Multimodal AI for Predicting Long-Term Functional Outcomes After Ischemic Stroke Using Only Admission Data

McBride, F.; Huang, H.; Kapoor, A. K.; Oermann, E.; Frontera, J. A.; Razavian, N.

2026-05-29 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354289 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Purpose Prognostication after acute ischemic stroke often relies on limited variables and simple risk scores, despite richer information being available at admission. We developed a multimodal AI model using admission data to predict modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcomes and compared it to established tools. Methods In a retrospective study of ischemic stroke/TIA patients, we trained three modality-specific models on admission non-contrast head CT, history and physical notes, and structured clinical variables, and combined them in a weighted-average ensemble. We predicted binary (mRS 0-2 versus 3-6) and ordinal mRS (0-6) outcomes at discharge and 90 days. Performance on an external test cohort was compared with THRIVE and SPAN-100 scores using AUROC, AUPRC, Brier score, mean absolute error (MAE), and quadratic weighted kappa (QWK). Results A total of 6,915 patients were split into training, validation and testing cohorts in a 3:1:1 ratio. For discharge binary mRS (n=1596), the multimodal ensemble achieved significantly better discrimination (AUROC 0.859, AUPRC 0.858) with 25-61% lower Brier scores than THRIVE or SPAN?100 (all p<0.001). For 90?day binary mRS (n=207), the model also outperformed both THRIVE and SPAN-100 (AUROC 0.838, AUPRC 0.805, with 3-38% lower Brier scores). Ordinal mRS prediction showed similarly strong performance with significantly better QWK at discharge and numerically lower MAE. The multimodal ensemble model reassigned about one?third of patients to different risk categories versus THRIVE and was closer to the true discharge outcome in ~74% of discordant cases. Conclusions We developed a well-calibrated multimodal AI model for prediction of discharge and 90-day post-stroke functional outcomes using only data present at the time of admission. This model outperforms existing prognostic tools and can support early clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.1%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.1%
3
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
25
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
28
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%