Biological Age and Complication Prediction in Hypertension: A 13-Year Cohort
Kim, B.-s.; Bae, C.-y.; Kim, I.-h.; Choi, Y.-j.; Jeon, M.-h.
Show abstract
1. Background: With the rising prevalence of hypertension, especially among younger populations, there is a critical need to better assess health status and predict associated complications. This study developed a biological age model ("hypertension age") for hypertensive patients to predict the risk and timing of major complications. 2. Methods: Using South Korea's NHIS-NHID data, researchers analyzed 4,535,041 hypertensive patients who underwent health examinations between 2009 and 2010. Patients were followed for an average of 12.40 years (until 2022). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to develop the biological age (cBA) model. The risk and onset timing of complications were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards and multiple regression models, adjusting for variables like medication use and baseline diseases. 3. Results: A 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in the age gap?where biological age exceeds chronological age (cBA - CA)?was significantly associated with an elevated risk for all major complications in both sexes (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a 1-SD increase in this gap significantly accelerated the time to complication onset for nearly all conditions (p < 0.001), with the exception of dementia in women. The impacts of medication use, hypertension duration, and baseline comorbidities varied by specific complication. 4. Conclusions: Lowering "hypertension age" relative to chronological age can significantly reduce the risk and delay the onset of major cardiovascular and related complications. Quantifying this biological age gap serves as a powerful motivational tool for personalized health management and complication prevention in hypertensive patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The prediction of cardiovascular events by phenotype of central and peripheral blood pressure in subjects without hypertension 96%
- Factors Associated with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Results of a prospective observational Study 95%
- Orthostatic Blood Pressure Transitions: Association with Symptoms and Frailty 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamic Differences Between Women and Men with Elevated Blood Pressure in China 96%
- Alpha globin gene copy number and hypertension risk among Black Americans 94%
- Socioeconomic Differentials in Hypertension based on JNC7 and ACC/AHA 2017 Guidelines Mediated by Body Mass Index: Evidence from Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 96%
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 95%
- Evolving patterns of prevalence and management of hypertension phenotypes in Mexico: A two-decade analysis of nationally representative surveys 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectories of Cognitive Decline Before and After New-onset Hypertension 95%
- Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers with the Risk of Hospitalization and Death in Hypertensive Patients with Coronavirus Disease-19 93%
- Joint associations of pregnancy complications and postpartum maternal renal biomarkers with severe cardiovascular morbidities: A US racially diverse prospective birth cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 94%
- Pool walking may temporarily improve renal function by suppressing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in pregnant women 93%
- Genetic Predictors of Blood Pressure Traits are Associated with Preeclampsia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.