Back

Segmental Lung Sound Analysis in Obstructive Lung Diseases Using Electronic Stethoscope; a protocol to establish an acoustic repository

Anuradha, H.; Yasaratne, D.; GMRI, G.; Parakrama, E.; Severin, R.

2026-05-28 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354263 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Obstructive lung diseases (OLDs) are responsible for high rates of illness and death worldwide. Inflammation, chronic airflow limitation, and bronchial remodeling occur in OLD and eventually result in the unique respiratory sounds. Despite its subjective and having low reproducibility, still traditional auscultation using a manual stethoscope is the main method used to identify the lung sounds. Nevertheless, the combination of recent advancements in digital stethoscopes and AI (Artificial Intelligence) has permitted the objective measurement of lung sounds. Nevertheless, there is a lack of standardized, region-specific databases for AI training and validation. Even though lung sound classification is an emerging aspect in research and telerehabilitation the lobar wise acoustic pattern is still novel due to lack of prevailing database to train AI models. Identifying this gap this study aims to develop an acoustic repository and analyze the data using segmental lung sounds from patients with OLDs and healthy controls through an electronic stethoscope. Methods and analysis This is a cross sectional observational study involving 120 participants (60 OLD patients and 60 healthy controls). Lobar wise acoustic signals will be captured using an electronic stethoscope in healthy and diseases population. The data will be analyzed using Audacity software for annotations and then it will be used for feature extraction and statistical analysis. The acoustic features extracted through Audacity, will include frequency, intensity, pitch, and root mean square (RMS) energy. Repeated measures ANOVA will be applied to compare mean sound intensities across lung segments while Pearson correlation will be used to assess associations with body composition parameters. The data will then be standardized for AI-based diagnostic applications. Ethics and dissemination The study is being reviewed from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya (2025/EC/87) will be sought. Informed consent will be obtained in writing. The dissemination of results will take place through peer-reviewed publications and the creation of a public database containing lung sounds from the region.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.0%
3
Respiratory Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
5
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
9
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
26
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%