Back

Segmental Lung Sound Analysis in Obstructive Lung Diseases Using Electronic Stethoscope; a protocol to establish an acoustic repository

Anuradha, H.; Yasaratne, D.; GMRI, G.; Parakrama, E.; Severin, R.

2026-05-28 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354263 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Obstructive lung diseases (OLDs) are responsible for high rates of illness and death worldwide. Inflammation, chronic airflow limitation, and bronchial remodeling occur in OLD and eventually result in the unique respiratory sounds. Despite its subjective and having low reproducibility, still traditional auscultation using a manual stethoscope is the main method used to identify the lung sounds. Nevertheless, the combination of recent advancements in digital stethoscopes and AI (Artificial Intelligence) has permitted the objective measurement of lung sounds. Nevertheless, there is a lack of standardized, region-specific databases for AI training and validation. Even though lung sound classification is an emerging aspect in research and telerehabilitation the lobar wise acoustic pattern is still novel due to lack of prevailing database to train AI models. Identifying this gap this study aims to develop an acoustic repository and analyze the data using segmental lung sounds from patients with OLDs and healthy controls through an electronic stethoscope. Methods and analysis This is a cross sectional observational study involving 120 participants (60 OLD patients and 60 healthy controls). Lobar wise acoustic signals will be captured using an electronic stethoscope in healthy and diseases population. The data will be analyzed using Audacity software for annotations and then it will be used for feature extraction and statistical analysis. The acoustic features extracted through Audacity, will include frequency, intensity, pitch, and root mean square (RMS) energy. Repeated measures ANOVA will be applied to compare mean sound intensities across lung segments while Pearson correlation will be used to assess associations with body composition parameters. The data will then be standardized for AI-based diagnostic applications. Ethics and dissemination The study is being reviewed from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya (2025/EC/87) will be sought. Informed consent will be obtained in writing. The dissemination of results will take place through peer-reviewed publications and the creation of a public database containing lung sounds from the region.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%