Back

Extension of the FUNC score for prediction of 12-month functional independence after primary intracerebral hemorrhage

Neves Briard, J.; Kansara, V.; Shen, Q.; Song, Y. L.; Cami, A. B.; Velazquez, A.; Esposito, J. M.; Klein, A. J.; Ghoshal, S.; Agarwal, S.; Park, S.; Connolly, E. S.; Roh, D.; Claassen, J.

2026-05-29 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354249 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The Functional Outcome in Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage (FUNC) score was initially validated for prediction of functional independence on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 90 days after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but recovery often extends beyond three months. Aims: Our objective was to extend the FUNC score for prediction of 12-month functional independence to strengthen its utility for family counseling and research methodology. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study enrolling adult patients with primary ICH between February 2009 and January 2018. We calculated FUNC scores at admission and assessed GOS 12 months after ICH. The primary outcome was 12-month functional independence, defined as a GOS score [≥]4. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the FUNC score using logistic regression, handling missing GOS with multiple imputation by chained equations. We evaluated score calibration using a calibration curve and the Brier score, and we assessed clinical utility using decision curve analysis. We explored the statistical efficiency gains of using FUNC-based sliding dichotomy thresholds for favorable outcome definitions by running simulations of a clinical trial with 1:1 randomization. We ran 5000 simulations for each sample size (100 to 1000, in increments of 10) and treatment effect (odds ratio of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5) combination and calculated efficiency gains for each respective treatment effect as the percentage reduction in sample size required to have 80% power using sliding versus fixed dichotomy thresholds. Results: A total of 535 patients were included (median [IQR] age 68 [54-79], 237 [44%] female, median [IQR] NIHSS 16 [6-25], median [IQR] FUNC 8 [6-9]). Overall, 99 of 445 (22%) patients with known 12-month GOS achieved functional independence. The FUNC score had an AUC of 0.79 (95%-CI: 0.75-0.84) for 12-month functional independence. The calibration plot was reasonable, with modest evidence of overestimation at low predicted probabilities, and the Brier score was 0.15. A net benefit was observed across 5-50% threshold probabilities. Sliding dichotomy had an efficiency gain of 27% for a treatment effect of OR=2.0, and a gain of 22% for a treatment effect of OR=2.5. The efficiency gain for a treatment effect of OR=1.5 could not be calculated because the fixed dichotomy did not reach 80% power despite a sample size of 1000 patients. Conclusions: The FUNC score's predictive performance for 12-month functional independence was comparable to its originally validated 3-month discrimination. Following external validation across centers, the FUNC score may be leveraged to counsel families on global measures of long-term functional independence and to implement sliding dichotomy methodology in ICH research.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
9
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
11
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%