Understanding problems and solutions related to accessing cervical screening for people with a physical disability, condition, impairment or difference
Kemp, E.; Sim, J.; Wright-Bevans, K.; Renke, S.; Chew-Graham, C. A.; Finney, A.; Harper, C.; Marlow, L. A.; Sherman, S. M.
Show abstract
Background Physically Disabled women are less likely to access cervical screening than non-disabled women, yet little research has been conducted to understand the problems that Disabled women face or potential solutions. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 1493 UK-based participants who identified as having a physical disability, impairment, condition, or difference that makes cervical screening difficult or impossible. Participants were presented with statements about cervical screening problems and potential solutions and asked to indicate agreement using a 5-point scale. They also provided open-ended comments. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, multinomial logistic regression and thematic analysis. Results More than half of participants reported delaying/missing (46.8%) or never attending (8.8%) screening, with most of those (71.0% and 81.4% respectively) indicating that the main reason was disability-related factors. The highest levels of agreement for problems were for concerns about pain, embarrassment, and fear of what the test might find and for potential solutions were for having a doctor or nurse who is willing to try different solutions, discusses specific needs, and understands physical disability. Never-attendance (OR = 0.022, 95% CI 0.014, 0.035) and delaying or missing appointments, (OR = 0.057, 95% CI 0.043, 0.076) negatively predicted future screening attendance. Six themes were identified from open-ended comments, supporting and extending the quantitative findings. Conclusion Disabled women face the same problems related to cervical screening as non-disabled women and additionally face disability-specific problems. Cervical sample taker training should incorporate ways to support physically Disabled women to have equitable access to screening.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 96%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 96%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 94%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 96%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 95%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 95%
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 94%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of intensified health education, SMS/phone tracing and transport reimbursement for uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Malawi: a mixed methods study 95%
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 95%
- Lower limb chronic edema management program: Perspectives of disengaged patients on challenges, enablers and barriers to program attendance and adherence 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.