Back

MRI-Based Pressure Gradient Mapping in Patient-Specific Models of Coarctation of the Aorta

Nair, P.; Ferrari, L.; Loecher, M.; McGrath, C. M.; Castillo Passi, C. A.; Marsden, A. L.; Ennis, D. B.

2026-06-03 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.27.26353898 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Accurate assessment of the pressure gradient ({Delta}P) across aortic coarctation (CoA) is critical for determining disease severity and the need for intervention. Current non-invasive methods are unreliable, while invasive catheterization remains the clinical gold standard. This study evaluates a novel MRI acquisition strategy, 4D-FlowP, that simultaneously encodes blood velocity and acceleration to enable reliable non-invasive pressure gradient mapping in CoA. Methods: Patient-specific compliant aortic phantoms were created from clinical MRI data of two patients with CoA. Additional geometries were synthetically generated by increasing stenosis severity. Phantoms were studied in an MRI compatible flow loop under physiologically realistic flow and pressure conditions. Pressure gradients were estimated using conventional 4D-Flow MRI, 4D-FlowP, and fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations. Results were compared against ground-truth catheter-based measurements across multiple flow rates and stenosis severities. Results: Conventional 4D-Flow consistently underestimated {Delta}P (slope = 0.63, R2=0.75) relative to catheter measurements. In contrast, 4D-FlowP demonstrated substantially improved agreement (slope = 0.95, R2=0.75). FSI simulations showed the highest overall agreement with catheter-derived {Delta}P (slope = 1.14, R2=0.82). Scan times for 4D-FlowP were comparable to 4D-Flow (26 vs. 24 minutes). Conclusion: 4D-FlowP enables a more accurate MRI-based pressure gradient mapping in CoA than conventional 4D-Flow, when compared to ground truth catheter measurements. These findings support further in vivo evaluation of 4D-FlowP as a non-invasive alternative for functional assessment of CoA severity

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.9%
2
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
4
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.4%
20
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
27
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%