Back

Juvenile-mimicry explains adult-juvenile resemblance in swallows and martins (Aves: Hirundinidae)

Hasegawa, M.

2026-05-29 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.26.728048 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A similar phenotype exhibited by both adults and juveniles is often considered a self-evident default state due to shared genes and similar ecological niches, and thus the function of adult-juvenile resemblance is rarely addressed. An adaptive explanation for adult-juvenile resemblance is that adults mimic juveniles to attract mates by exploiting their parental care behavior and to avoid agonistic intrasexual combat from rivals that tolerate juveniles (i.e., the juvenile-mimicry hypothesis). Using a phylogenetic comparative approach, we tested the juvenile-mimicry hypothesis in aerial foragers, swallows and martins (Aves: Hirundinidae), in which adults and juveniles frequently encounter one another in their open habitat. We predicted that, if adults mimic juveniles, adult-juvenile resemblance should be enhanced in species with many young (i.e., a large number of models in relation to mimics) as well as species with a few young (i.e., a default state with limited intensity of sexual selection). This prediction was confirmed by a quadratic relationship between number of juveniles and adult-juvenile resemblance. In addition, as predicted under the juvenile-mimicry hypothesis, adult-juvenile resemblance was enhanced in species with multiple broods, in which juvenile-mimicry would be particularly effective due to the mating period followed by juvenile production. The observed pattern could not be explained by sexual selection for male ornamentation alone (i.e., with no juvenile-mimicry) even when considering the cost of ornamentation. An alternative explanation that juveniles mimic adults is also unlikely, as the situation favors the opposite pattern. The current study therefore supports the juvenile-mimicry hypothesis, indicating an adaptive function of adult-juvenile resemblance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
4
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.5%
5
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
11
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
13
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
20
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Biological Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%