Back

Sialidase-Mediated Desialylation Regulating EGFR Phosphorylation and Signal Flux

Liu, H.; Wei, E.; Lin, D. C.; Zhang, h.

2026-05-29 cell biology
10.64898/2026.05.26.728000 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein glycosylation and phosphorylation are fundamental post-translational modifications (PTMs) that coordinate cellular signaling. While receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) like the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are heavily glycosylated, the systems-level crosstalk between extracellular sialylation and intracellular phosphorylation dynamics remains poorly understood. We employed an integrated TMT18-labeled multi-omics pipeline to simultaneously profile the global proteome, phosphoproteome, and N-glycoproteome of A498 cells. Using enzymatic in-situ remodeling with sialidase, we investigated the signaling response to EGF stimulation and the synergistic effects of desialylation with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) gefitinib. Our analysis revealed that cell surface desialylation significantly attenuates EGF-induced signaling, specifically suppressing over 200 phosphosites within the MAPK cascade and actin cytoskeleton organization modules. Comparative profiling demonstrated that sialidase treatment exerts a distinct regulatory program that is non-redundant with canonical TKI inhibition. Stoichiometric analysis confirmed that the depletion of sialylated N-glycoforms at specific EGFR residues (N413, N444) directly correlates with reduced phosphorylation at key activation sites (Y1197). Finally, an integrated glyco-phospho network analysis identified CD44, MET, and integrin signaling hubs as central nodes regulated by the sialylation. This study establishes cell surface sialylation as a critical rheostat for EGFR-mediated signaling flux. By bridging the gap between the extracellular glycoprotein and intracellular kinase networks, we identify glycan remodeling as a potent strategy to sensitize RTK-driven malignancies to therapy. Our findings provide a robust data foundation for developing glycoconjugate-targeted interventions in ccRCC and beyond.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
2
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.8%
3
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.3%
6
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
8
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
10
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
12
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
14
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Glycobiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
23
Nature Cell Biology
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Nature Metabolism
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Cell Discovery
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
27
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
28
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%