Back

PCR-free, targeted genomic sequencing using Dynamically optimized reference Adaptive Sampling (DORAS)

Borcard, L.; Gempeler, S.; Terrazos Miani, M. A.; Casanova, C.; Ramette, A.

2026-05-29 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.26.727915 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has become a cornerstone of clinical microbiology, enabling comprehensive analysis of microbial genome diversity. However, WGS is often computationally intensive and time-consuming when applied to specific applications like multilocus sequence typing (MLST), where only a subset of genes is only needed for typing. This study evaluates the potential of adaptive sampling (AS), a software-based solution available on Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) devices, to optimize sequencing runs for MLST by reducing the production of unnecessary reads falling outside of the target areas. We demonstrate that AS, when used directly with the target gene sequences, does not reach sufficient target coverage when compared to WGS baseline sequencing due to inefficient read recruitment. Thus, we developed a novel, PCR-free approach, termed Dynamically Optimized Reference Adaptive Sampling (DORAS), which streamlines gene-specific enrichment by targeting genomic regions of interest and their genomic vicinity. DORAS first determines the genomic context of regions of interest for each sample, and then dynamically adjusts the length of the reference sequences during live sequencing. Consensus sequences are periodically constructed and evaluated for taxonomic classification. We demonstrate that full MLST profiles can be obtained in approximately half the time required for whole-genome sequencing to achieve 30X coverage (3 vs. 6 h), with no additional hands-on library preparation time. Validation on clinical isolates from hospital outbreaks belonging to Corynebacterium diphtheriae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and routine clinical E. coli isolates, demonstrated the consistent retrieval of MLST types as compared to standard WGS methods. DORAS thus offers a cost-effective, efficient solution for routine surveillance and outbreak investigations based on MLST types in the clinical setting.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
4
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.2%
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
13
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
22
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
25
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
27
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%