Back

MyoNet and AlveoliNet: A hybrid 3D neural-net pipeline for the instance segmentation and scoring of epithelial cells in intact mammary alveoli

Monks, C. R.; Fester, S. A.; Nicks, C. J.; Coger, K.; Monks, J.

2026-05-29 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.05.26.727878 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in tissue clearing protocols such as DISCO, CUBIC, Clarity, FUnGI, and PEGASOS have revolutionized our ability to label and image intact 3-dimensional (3D) biological structures using fluorescence microscopy. The lactating mammary gland particularly benefits from clearing due to its high degree of tissue opacity. Cleared mammary gland images are strikingly beautiful and complicated but are difficult to fully interpret without developing a series of quantitative techniques and assays to analyze and compare them. These approaches will ultimately be as varied as the biology each scientist wishes to study. Here, we present one strategy based on a modular, hybrid, deep-learning approach and classical image processing that can segment and measure alveoli, cell nuclei and myoepithelial cells in intact mammary tissue. We have developed two original, three-dimensional (3D) U-shaped encoder-decoder networks (U-Nets), AlveoliNet and MyoNet, and combined these with CellPose3 nuclear instance segmentation and SlideBook/SlideBook Synergy binary mask operations. This approach can be used to easily score 100,000s of cells in intact tissue and differentiated glands at different developmental stages, genetic backgrounds, or treatments. We demonstrate the utility of this approach for quantifying the change in proportion of myoepithelial cells over the pregnancy-lactation transition, driven by endoreplication in the gland postpartum. We present a complete methods pipeline for other laboratories to utilize our approach in their own studies using standard desktop computers. Competing InterestsColin Monks is co-founder and co-President of Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Inc. (3i) and receives a salary from it.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.2%
3
Developmental Dynamics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
6
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
9
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
20
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
22
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
30
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%