Back

Phase of transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates working memory processing speed

Dimmendaal, J.; Wang, X.; Dijkslag, B. J.; Huizinga, L. E.; Maalderink, S.; Priest, M.; van Dam, F. J. E.; Span, M. M.; Wischnewski, M.

2026-05-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.26.727793 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTheta-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over prefrontal cortex has been proposed to modulate working memory (WM), yet behavioral effects are often inconsistent. One potential source of variability is the tACS phase during stimulus presentation. ObjectiveWe tested whether behavioral performance during WM depends on the phase of prefrontal theta-tACS. MethodsTwenty participants completed two sessions of prefrontal 4 Hz tACS in a within-subject design, receiving active and sham stimulation in separate sessions. Participants performed a visuospatial change detection task (CDT) and a verbal N-back task. Stimulation effects on overall accuracy and reaction time were analyzed. Subsequently, phase-specific analyses related stimulation phase at task-relevant stimulus presentation to behavioral performance using circular regression models. Preferred phases across participants were tested using Rayleigh tests. ResultsNo significant overall effects of active compared with sham tACS on accuracy or reaction time were observed in either task. However, phase-specific analyses revealed stronger phase-dependent modulation of reaction time during active tACS compared with sham. In the CDT, this effect was present across difficulty levels, whereas in the N-back task it was observed only in the 3-back condition. No reliable phase-dependent effects were observed for accuracy. Preferred phases varied across participants and did not cluster around a common phase. ConclusionsPrefrontal theta-tACS can modulate WM performance in a phase-dependent manner even in the absence of average behavioral effects. The observation of phase-dependent reaction-time modulation across visuospatial and verbal WM tasks suggests that stimulation phase may be a relevant source of variability across cognitive domains.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.1%
2
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
4
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
7
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
13
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
14
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
16
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
17
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
18
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
21
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
23
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
24
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
28
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%