Back

FASTIMAGES: Validating replay detection methods in human Neuroimaging using a combined MEG and fMRI dataset

Kern, S.; Wittkuhn, L.; Buss, E.; Schuck, N.; Feld, G. B.

2026-05-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.26.727586 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studies in rodents and humans using invasive electrophysiology have established that neural replay is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the brain that is associated with a wide range of cognitive functions, including memory, planning and decision making. Yet, invasively recording in humans remains difficult, and hence knowledge about replay in humans remains scarce. Hence, to comprehensively understand replay in humans, we need reliable approaches that can detect it non-invasively. Several main non-invasive approaches have been proposed, but we lack a full comparative validation against known ground truth signals. In this study, we present FASTIMAGES, a benchmark dataset from seventy participants with parallel fMRI (n = 40, previously published) and MEG (n=30) recordings containing known neural sequences evoked by fast visual stimulation as well as functional localizer trials. The neural sequences were elicited by five different visual stimuli shown in sequences at speeds of 132, 164, 228 and 612 milliseconds onset-to-onset intervals. Using this dataset, we investigate two existing statistical methods for sequence detection, namely Temporally Delayed Linear Modelling (TDLM, developed for MEG by Liu et al., 2021) and Slope Order Dynamic Analysis (SODA, developed for fMRI by Wittkuhn & Schuck, 2021). We examine the underlying assumptions of each method, analyse their resulting strengths and weaknesses in application to MEG and fMRI. We demonstrate that both approaches excel in their native modality (TDLM for MEG and SODA for fMRI), with comparable effect sizes given idealized conditions in this benchmark. Cross-modality transfer remains challenging. Finally, the FASTIMAGES dataset provides data with known and clearly expressed sequences and can be used to benchmark and validate future sequence detection methods under idealized conditions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.2%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
3
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
9
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%