FASTIMAGES: Validating replay detection methods in human Neuroimaging using a combined MEG and fMRI dataset
Kern, S.; Wittkuhn, L.; Buss, E.; Schuck, N.; Feld, G. B.
Show abstract
Studies in rodents and humans using invasive electrophysiology have established that neural replay is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the brain that is associated with a wide range of cognitive functions, including memory, planning and decision making. Yet, invasively recording in humans remains difficult, and hence knowledge about replay in humans remains scarce. Hence, to comprehensively understand replay in humans, we need reliable approaches that can detect it non-invasively. Several main non-invasive approaches have been proposed, but we lack a full comparative validation against known ground truth signals. In this study, we present FASTIMAGES, a benchmark dataset from seventy participants with parallel fMRI (n = 40, previously published) and MEG (n=30) recordings containing known neural sequences evoked by fast visual stimulation as well as functional localizer trials. The neural sequences were elicited by five different visual stimuli shown in sequences at speeds of 132, 164, 228 and 612 milliseconds onset-to-onset intervals. Using this dataset, we investigate two existing statistical methods for sequence detection, namely Temporally Delayed Linear Modelling (TDLM, developed for MEG by Liu et al., 2021) and Slope Order Dynamic Analysis (SODA, developed for fMRI by Wittkuhn & Schuck, 2021). We examine the underlying assumptions of each method, analyse their resulting strengths and weaknesses in application to MEG and fMRI. We demonstrate that both approaches excel in their native modality (TDLM for MEG and SODA for fMRI), with comparable effect sizes given idealized conditions in this benchmark. Cross-modality transfer remains challenging. Finally, the FASTIMAGES dataset provides data with known and clearly expressed sequences and can be used to benchmark and validate future sequence detection methods under idealized conditions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.