Back

Variation in seagrass habitat use by fishery-important nekton across the Gulf of Mexico revealed by deep transfer learning with trophic group priors

Li, L.; Rodemann, J.; Hayes, C.; Belgrad, B.; Darnell, K. M.; Martin, C. W.; Furman, B. T.; Smee, D. L.; Darnell, M. Z.

2026-05-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.26.727508 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how species use habitats across environmental gradients is central to guiding fisheries management and habitat restoration, yet inference is often limited by heterogeneous data and inconsistent observations. In coastal ecosystems, variation in relationships between nekton and seagrass habitats remains unresolved, in part because habitat structure, environmental context, and sampling methods are rarely integrated in predictive models. Here, we combine multi-gear monitoring data from across the Gulf of Mexico with a transfer-learning framework that incorporates trophic priors to quantify how nekton respond to seagrass structure under varying environmental conditions. We show that environmental gradients--including temperature, salinity, and water clarity--define broad-scale distributions, while seagrass structure refines habitat use at local scales. Apparent inconsistencies in seagrass-nekton relationships are largely attributable to environmental context and differences in observational processes. By integrating observations collected using different sampling methods, our approach reveals consistent species-environment relationships across sites and improves predictive performance, particularly for data-limited species, by using trophic priors. We further show that species differ in their responses to environmental gradients, with some exhibiting consistent patterns across sites and others showing strong context dependence. These results demonstrate that combining heterogeneous datasets can strengthen ecological inference and provide a pathway for scalable, data-driven conservation and restoration in rapidly changing coastal systems.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.2%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.5%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
6
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
10
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
12
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
17
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
25
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%