Back

Comparative nectar metabolomics reveals sucrose-nitrogen tradeoffs and chemical drivers of microbial growth in floral nectar

Vannette, R.; Rering, C.; Cecala, J. M.; Landucci, L.; Lanier, A.

2026-05-27 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.26.727296 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMany plant species secrete nectar to attract beneficial animals. The chemical composition of floral nectar influences pollinator nutrition and behavior, as well as microbial growth in flowers. Yet factors that predict nectar composition across plant species, as well as chemical compounds determining microbial growth in nectar, remain poorly understood. MethodsWe used both targeted and untargeted metabolomics to compare the nectar chemical profiles across 31 phylogenetically diverse plant species that span a range of floral morphologies. We examined the common classes of compounds detected in nectar and patterns of co-occurrence among them. We combined newly collected chemical data with previously published data on microbial growth in nectar of the same plant species to examine how nectar chemistry is associated with microbial growth. ResultsPlant species and clades varied in amino acid, minor sugar, and secondary metabolite composition and concentration. Sampled rosids and lilioids generally contained higher amino acids while asterids contained greater concentrations of oligosaccharides and sugar alcohols. Across plant species, proteinogenic amino acids frequently co-occurred in nectar but many were negatively associated with sucrose concentration. Plant species with greater concentrations of amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds hosted greater microbial density in nectar, while some other compound groups were negatively associated with microbial diversity. ConclusionsNegative correlations between nectar amino acid and sucrose concentration across species suggest ecological tradeoffs or physiological constraints in nectar composition. Given that the growth of common nectar microbes is limited by amino acid concentration, these findings suggest an ecological cost to amino acid production in nectar. Finally, we document variation among species in nectar vitamins, non proteinogenic amino acids and secondary metabolites with hypothesized yet currently untested ecological roles.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
3
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
9.9%
4
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.1%
12
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
14
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
16
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
18
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
21
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
23
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%