Back

Weight-Guided Constraints for Body Model and Lead Selection in Pediatric CIED MRI Safety Simulations

Hameed, S.; Henry, K.; Jiang, F.; Bhusal, B.; Dillenbeck, H.; Gakenheimer-Smith, L.; Webster, G.; Golestani Rad, L.

2026-05-30 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354162 medRxiv
Show abstract

Pediatric patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) face limited MRI access due to RF-induced heating, and computational modeling is increasingly used to characterize this risk. The validity of these simulations, however, depends on pairing body models with clinically realistic lead configurations, guidance that is currently lacking. We retrospectively analyzed 302 CIED surgeries in 281 pediatric patients to derive weight-based constraints for simulation design. Weight alone discriminated epicardial from endocardial lead implantation with AUC = 0.90, and adding age and height yielded no improvement, supporting weight as a sufficient single-parameter selection metric. The probabilistic crossover between approaches occurred at 44~kg, substantially higher than the 10 to 15~kg threshold commonly cited in the literature, with a broad transition zone of 21 to 66~kg in which both lead types were routinely used. Lead length was likewise weight-constrained: only 25~cm leads were observed in patients below 6~kg, and leads of 45~cm or longer were uncommon below 50~kg. These findings yield a three-tier framework, with epicardial-only configurations below 21~kg, dual configurations within 21 to 66~kg, and weight-thresholded lead lengths throughout, enabling MRI safety simulations to focus on clinically realizable anatomy and device combinations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.3%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
5
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
8
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
12
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
13
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.4%
15
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
17
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
23
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
24
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%