Back

Establishing a framework for human dose prediction in anti-tuberculosis drug development

Patel, A.; Li, A. T.; Solans, B.; Savic, R.

2026-05-28 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354063 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rationale: Efficacious dose selection for anti-tuberculosis drugs has traditionally relied on achieving plasma exposures above the minimum inhibitory concentration, but this approach has not consistently aligned with clinical outcomes. Objectives: We sought to identify early pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets most predictive of clinical efficacious dose. Methods: We conducted a back-translational, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic simulation-based analysis of 15 anti-tuberculosis drugs. Using pharmacokinetic data from multiple biological matrices and a range of pharmacodynamic metrics, we established candidate exposure-response targets for attainment. We systematically evaluated the predictive accuracy of each target pair against established clinical doses to formulate a decision-making framework linking key drug properties to the most predictive targets. Measurements and Main Results: Depending on the target used, projected clinical doses varied widely - both within and across compounds - highlighting the importance of target selection for dose projection and go/no-go decisions. In general, targeting cellular lesion-level drug exposures relative to in vivo preclinical potency provided an effective approach for early dose selection. However, for highly penetrating drugs, targeting site-of-action therapeutic exposures in the caseum was more predictive of clinical dose. Based on these findings, we developed a preliminary dose prediction tool that enables drug developers to estimate clinically relevant dose ranges of compounds using in vitro and early in vivo data. Conclusions: This work establishes and validates a simple, evidence-based framework to standardize early translational decision-making on dose selection of anti-tuberculosis candidates in development.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
2
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
6
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
16
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
17
Archives of Toxicology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%