Back

Establishing a framework for human dose prediction in anti-tuberculosis drug development

Patel, A.; Li, A. T.; Solans, B.; Savic, R.

2026-05-28 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354063 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rationale: Efficacious dose selection for anti-tuberculosis drugs has traditionally relied on achieving plasma exposures above the minimum inhibitory concentration, but this approach has not consistently aligned with clinical outcomes. Objectives: We sought to identify early pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets most predictive of clinical efficacious dose. Methods: We conducted a back-translational, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic simulation-based analysis of 15 anti-tuberculosis drugs. Using pharmacokinetic data from multiple biological matrices and a range of pharmacodynamic metrics, we established candidate exposure-response targets for attainment. We systematically evaluated the predictive accuracy of each target pair against established clinical doses to formulate a decision-making framework linking key drug properties to the most predictive targets. Measurements and Main Results: Depending on the target used, projected clinical doses varied widely - both within and across compounds - highlighting the importance of target selection for dose projection and go/no-go decisions. In general, targeting cellular lesion-level drug exposures relative to in vivo preclinical potency provided an effective approach for early dose selection. However, for highly penetrating drugs, targeting site-of-action therapeutic exposures in the caseum was more predictive of clinical dose. Based on these findings, we developed a preliminary dose prediction tool that enables drug developers to estimate clinically relevant dose ranges of compounds using in vitro and early in vivo data. Conclusions: This work establishes and validates a simple, evidence-based framework to standardize early translational decision-making on dose selection of anti-tuberculosis candidates in development.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.4%
2
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
23
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%