Back

Cross-Phenotype Plasma Proteomics Reveals Molecular Heterogeneity in Neovascular AMD

Rijken, R.; Pameijer, E. M.; de Ligt, A.; Stehouwer, M.; Imhof, S. M.; Thiadens, A. A. H. J.; den Hollander, A. I.; Gerritsen, B.; Nguyen, X.-T.-A.; Hoyng, C. B.; de Groot, E. L.; van den Born, L. I.; Ossewaarde-van Norel, J.; Los, L. I.; Moekotte, L.; Smoor, M. A.; van Genderen, M. M.; Ten Dam-van Loon, N. H.; van Huet, R. A. C.; Boon, C. J. F.; de Jong-Hesse, Y.; de Boer, J. H.; van Leeuwen, R.; Kuiper, J. J. W.

2026-06-02 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354036 medRxiv
Show abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) shows substantial clinical heterogeneity that remains unexplained despite extensive genetic and clinical characterization. We evaluated whether proteomic stratification could provide insight beyond clinical phenotype and genetic risk. We performed 384-plex plasma proteomics in a cohort of 215 individuals, including patients with early and late neovascular AMD, other complement-associated retinal diseases, and age-matched controls. Proteome-based reclassification identified four disease-overarching clusters. Neovascular AMD cases were partitioned almost exclusively between two clusters (30/36). Early AMD cases were predominantly assigned to one of these clusters (10/18), whereas only two localized to the other (2/18). Both AMD-associated clusters shared elevated levels of a protein module enriched for lipoprotein-related functions compared to the other clusters. However, the cluster containing both early and neovascular AMD cases showed higher levels of additional protein modules enriched for complement pathways and cellular stress-response pathways compared with the other AMD-associated cluster. Importantly, this molecular divergence in neovascular AMD could not be explained by genetic predisposition (i.e., 52-variant AMD genetic risk score), signatures of biological ageing, nor by other clinical features. Together, these findings support two proteomic endotypes of neovascular AMD with distinct involvement of cellular stress pathways.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.2%
2
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.8%
4
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.8%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
9
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Molecular Neurodegeneration
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.0%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
22
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%