Back

Long-read Oxford Nanopore sequencing reveals complex rearrangements and regulatory disruption in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Alhazmi, M. H.; Poile, C.; Dzialo, J.; Bzura, A.; Kutywayo, K.; Fennell, D.; Hollox, E. J.

2026-06-02 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.26.26353864 medRxiv
Show abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy characterised by extensive structural genomic alterations and a low burden of recurrent single nucleotide variants. However, the full spectrum and functional impact of structural variation (SVs) remain incompletely understood because short-read sequencing has limitation ability to resolve complex genomic rearrangements. Here, we performed integrated short-read and long-read whole-genome sequencing on tumour-normal pairs from three MPM patients, together with RNA sequencing and nanopore-derived promoter methylation profiling. Long-reads sequencing substantially improved SV detection, identifying 61-156 novel SVs per sample, including complex rearrangements and breakpoint-resolved events affecting cancer-associated genes. Complex SV clusters consistent with chromoplexy and chromothripsis were observed and frequently involved oncogenes. Integration with transcriptomics data showed that several SVs-affected genes, including WEE1 and GPC6, exhibited increased expression independent of gene dosage. Promoter methylation analysis revealed a conserved bimodal methylation landscape across tumours and a significant inverse relationship with gene expression. SV-associated genes showed coordinated promoter hypermethylation and transcriptional activation, suggesting that SVs may influence gene regulation through epigenetic mechanisms. Survival analysis using the TCGA-MESO cohort further showed that elevated expression of WEE1 and GPC6 was associated with poorer overall survival. Together, these findings highlight the value of long-read sequencing for uncovering functionally and clinically relevant structural variation in MPM.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.