Back

Inferring the demographic history of Chinese and Indian rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) populations from PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing data

Heenkenda, E. J.; Versoza, C. J.; Terbot, J. W.; Soni, V.; Spatola, G. J.; Pfeifer, S. P.; Jensen, J. D.

2026-05-26 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.25.727731 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) is one of the most widely used animal models in biomedical research, both as it resembles humans in key biological aspects and as it is characterized by a broad geographic range. Most of the individuals housed in U.S. research colonies have been sampled from either China or India, though notably the source population of these animals has significantly shifted over time. Given the substantial genetic and immunological differences between these populations, a deeper understanding of the underlying population structure is critically important for biomedical interpretation. Despite this, the demographic histories of these two populations remain poorly resolved. Here, we present an analysis of whole-genome, PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing data from ten unrelated individuals of each population, applying four related model- and non-model based demographic inference approaches, in order to reconstruct their ancestral history. We evaluated the fit of the subsequently estimated models against the empirical data, and incorporated underlying uncertainty in the mutation rates used for scaling. We inferred a well-fitting population history characterized by substantial structure between Chinese and Indian populations, with a split time [~]140,000 generations ago from an ancestral population of [~]65,000 individuals. We additionally inferred the subsequent history of size change within, and gene flow between, these populations, reaching the current estimated sizes of [~]220,000 individuals in the Chinese population and [~]14,000 individuals in the Indian population. The robust baseline demographic model established in this study will serve as a valuable resource for future research on this species, including for improved fine-scale recombination mapping, selection inference, and association studies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
2
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.8%
3
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
21
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
25
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
26
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
29
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
30
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%